Skip to content
Rimsky Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rimsky Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$269kArts & Culture$240kInternational$78kFood & Nutrition$54kHuman Services$27kCrime & Legal$27kHealth$26kEducation$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$50,000
THE EYE CANCER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC$10,000
CITY HARVEST$6,000
DOROT INC$6,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL$6,000
SUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC$6,000
THE BAIL PROJECT INC$6,000
ONE ACRE FUND$6,000
NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM INC$2,000
WEST SIDE HATZOLOH$2,000
THE SUMMER CAMP INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOROT INC: $6k → 17%DOROT INC: $6k → 17%DOROT INC: $5k → 17%DOROT INC: $5k → 17%DOROT INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$718k · 16 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$718k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+50%

Still filing today

94%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $240k · revenue +38%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $228k · revenue +27%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $31k · revenue +198%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +167%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +50%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF BEDFORD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
3
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
4
United Jewish Federation of Northeastern New York Inc

To build / maintain a strong and united jewish community in order to ensure the continuity of the jewish people. the federation is the central agency for meeting jewish needs and articulating jewish concerns in the capital region, in…

Philanthropy
5
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Eye Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $228,289 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $27,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUN…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC: $240,000 · Arts & CultureLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $31,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…ONE ACRE FUND: $12,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…ASHOKA: $10,000 · InternationalASHOKAThe Eye Cancer Foundation Inc: $20,000 · HealthWest Side Hatzoloh: $6,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,595 · HealthDOROT INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $27,000 · Crime & LegalCITY HARVEST INC: $27,000 · Food & NutritionFARESTART: $15,000 · OtherSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · OtherCHABAD OF BEDFORD INC: $5,000 · OtherCHABAD OF TRIBECA: $5,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $2,000 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $9,000 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $3,000 · Other
Philanthropy$300,289Arts & Culture$240,000International$88,000Health$31,595Human Services$27,000Crime & Legal$27,000Food & Nutrition$27,000Other$53,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC: $240,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $228,289 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $27,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eye Cancer Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFARESTART: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHOKA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,595 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRhode Islanders Sponsoring Education: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD FIRE CO NO 1 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY17.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rimsky Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rimsky Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rimsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home