Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ridgefield Fresh Air Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$171kRecreation & Sports$161kHealth$30kEnvironment$24kEducation$8k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$368k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIDGEFIELD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$15,000
WILTON FAMILY Y$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WOODCOCK NATURE CENTER$5,000
REDDING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,000
A BETTER CHANCE RIDGEFIELD$3,000
CARDINAL SHEEHAN CENTER$3,000
TOWN OF RIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT$3,000
ABILITY BEYOND$2,000
MISHKAN ISRAEL SUMMER DAY CAMP$1,500
FRIENDS OF LACHAT (LITTLE FARMHANDS)$1,000
DANBURY GRASS ROOTS ACADEMY$1,000
JERICHO PARTNERSHIP SUMMER CAMP$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$393k · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$393k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD
    8× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +118%
  • WN
    WOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +93%
  • AB
    A Better Chance in Ridgefield Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +63%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Connecticut Golf Foundation Inc the First Tee of Connecticut

    To impact the lives of young people throughout connecticut by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.

    Youth Development
    2
    Boys and Girls Club of Greater Waterbury

    To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

    Youth Development
    3
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater New Bedford Inc

    The boys & girls club of greater new bedford, inc. is dedicated to providing a stimulating and wholesome environment which promotes social, educational, character and physical development for children and young adults ages 7 - 18 years.…

    Youth Development
    4
    Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

    The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

    Environment
    5
    Boys and Girls Club of Brattleboro Inc

    To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential productive, responsible and caring citizens.

    Youth Development
    6
    Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc

    To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

    7
    The Green Peacock Corporation

    we are driven to do our part to positively impact generations of healthy living through fitness, nutrition and wellness activities. we strive to build productive relationships and influence healthy culture throughout the communities we…

    Health
    8
    Connecticut Section Pga Golf Foundation Inc

    The foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization whose mission is to foster local and regional amateur golf competition with an emphasis on junior golf and to furnish instructional materials and programs designed to improve golfing…

    Recreation & Sports
    9
    Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

    To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

    10
    Connecticut Community Bicycle Workshop Inc

    Ccbw promotes enviromental, economic and racial equity through bike riding, repair and education.

    Human Services
    11
    Ridgefield Community Kindergarten Inc

    To provide preschool education for children ages 2-5.

    12
    Opportunities Industrialization Center of New Britain Inc

    Our mission is to help people to help themselves by contributing to the more efficient functioning of todays labor market by providing high quality employment and training.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cardinal Shehan Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Woodcock Nature Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    WILTON FAMILY Y — $38,000 · OtherWILTON FAMILY YIndividual grant recipient — $33,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREDDING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $29,500 · OtherREDDING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC — $23,000 · OtherCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INCA Better Chance in Ridgefield Inc — $17,000 · OtherA Better Chance in Ridgefield IncTOWN OF RIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT — $17,000 · OtherTOWN OF RIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENTCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INCNEW POND FOUNDATION — $14,000 · OtherNEW POND FOUNDATIONMISHKAN ISRAEL SUMMER DAY CAMP — $7,500 · Other+3 more — $17,500 · Other+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD — $101,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIE…FRESH AIR FUND — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR…HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $13,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN T…WOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC — $24,000 · EnvironmentABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC — $15,500 · Human ServicesDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC — $8,000 · Education
    Other$211,000Youth Development$101,500Recreation & Sports$33,000Environment$24,000Human Services$15,500Education$8,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD — $101,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetWOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC — $24,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC — $23,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetA Better Chance in Ridgefield Inc — $17,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC — $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RIDGEFIELD
    • Who funds WOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC
    • Who funds CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC
    • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND
    • Who funds A Better Chance in Ridgefield Inc
    • Who funds ABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC
    • Who funds CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    • Who funds DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Ridgefield Fresh Air Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
    • Cardinal Shehan Center Inc4% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ridgefield Fresh Air Association?

    Find your warmest path to Ridgefield Fresh Air Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph