Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rick C & Belinda G Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.3MReligion$1.5MYouth Development$1.0MPhilanthropy$1.0MHousing & Shelter$507kCrime & Legal$233kInternational$200kHealth$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $924k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$75,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$400,000
POTTER'S HOUSE$200,000
PREDISAN$190,000
EME MINISTRIES$185,325
RESTORE HUMANITY$118,000
TOUCH A LIFE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
COMPASSION HOUSE$55,200
LIFE SOURCE$43,000
CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES$42,000
NWA CHILDREN'S SHELTER$41,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NWA$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $726k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NWA CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $50k → 8%CHILDRENS HOME: $34k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES: $42k → 11%NWA CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $41k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $20k → 16%CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES: $38k → 11%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDRENS SHELTER: $25k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $20k → 16%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDRENS SHELTER: $25k → 8%RESTORE HUMANITY: $118k → 14%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDRENS SHELTER: $20k → 8%RESTORE HUMANITY: $100k → 14%RESTORE HUMANITY: $100k → 14%RESTORE HUMANITY: $20k → 14%NW ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $30k → 8%ARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK: $15k → 14%ARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK: $15k → 14%ARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK: $14k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

SD
PA
CA
MO
AR
TN
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 21 repeat orgs$868k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$6.6M
$763k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+360%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RESTORE HUMANITY INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $338k · revenue +39% · 34% of their budget
  • NA
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $191k · revenue +48%
  • SM
    SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $150k · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOURCES - INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICE
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • CA
    CASA ALELUYA BUILD YOUR HOUSE ON THE ROCK
    one grant, 2023 · $120k
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $74k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
2
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
3
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
6
Children's Choice Inc

Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…

Human Services
7
Chrysalis House Inc

Foster Care & Adoption Services

Human Services
8
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
9
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
10
Searcy Childrens Home Inc Sparrows Promise

Providing hope for children and families in the arkansas child welfare system provide foster care, supervised visitation services, a safe space for children to rest while waiting on a foster family and training for foster families.

—
11
The Children's Home Society of West Virginia Inc

To promote the social, emotional, spiritual and physical well being of children and their families throughout west virginia.

Human Services
12
Ark Homes Foster Family Agency

Our Mission is to create a better and safe environment for children, where they can have an opportunity to return to a more rewarding quality of life. Our goal is to effectively match the needs of each child in our care with appropriate…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sherwood & Myrtie Foster's Home for Children; the most unlike its peers is Touch a Life Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREDISAN: $1,395,000 · OtherPREDISANEME: $831,000 · OtherEMEIndividual grant recipient: $600,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIFESOURCE: $588,000 · OtherLIFESOURCESOURCES - INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICE: $500,000 · OtherSOURCES - INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICETHE POTTERS HOUSE: $500,000 · OtherTHE POTTERS HOUSEEME MINISTRIES: $405,325 · OtherEME MINISTRIESBUILD YOUR HOUSE ON THE ROCK: $387,280 · OtherBUILD YOUR HOUSE ON THE ROCKCOMPASSION HOUSE: $331,309 · OtherCASA OF NW ARKANSAS INC: $232,500 · Other+11 more: $662,600 · Other+11 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNI…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyRESTORE HUMANITY INC: $338,000 · Human ServicesRESTORE H…NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC: $191,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST…Christian Family Services: $80,400 · Human ServicesChristian…CHILDRENS HOME INC: $74,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS…ARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $43,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS …TOUCH-A-LIFE: $200,000 · InternationalTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $84,000 · Youth DevelopmentMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH: $55,000 · Health
Other$6,433,014Philanthropy$1,005,000Human Services$726,400International$200,000Youth Development$84,000Health$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRESTORE HUMANITY INC: $338,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetTOUCH-A-LIFE: $200,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC: $191,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $150,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $84,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetChristian Family Services: $80,400 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME INC: $74,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH: $55,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $43,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25,900 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH-A-LIFE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Family Services ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCELLERATE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rick C & Belinda G Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rick C & Belinda G Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rick C & Belinda G’s filings →

More from the funding graph