· Private foundation
Rick C & Belinda G Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $174k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $924k
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $400,000 |
| POTTER'S HOUSE | $200,000 |
| PREDISAN | $190,000 |
| EME MINISTRIES | $185,325 |
| RESTORE HUMANITY | $118,000 |
| TOUCH A LIFE | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| COMPASSION HOUSE | $55,200 |
| LIFE SOURCE | $43,000 |
| CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES | $42,000 |
| NWA CHILDREN'S SHELTER | $41,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NWA | $18,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $726k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RHRESTORE HUMANITY INC4× · 2018–2025 · $338k · revenue +39% · 34% of their budget
- NANORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC6× · 2018–2025 · $191k · revenue +48%
- SMSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN4× · 2017–2020 · $150k · revenue +194%
Funded once
- SISOURCES - INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICEone grant, 2021 · $500k
- CACASA ALELUYA BUILD YOUR HOUSE ON THE ROCKone grant, 2023 · $120k
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $74k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…
Foster Care & Adoption Services
Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.
Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…
Providing hope for children and families in the arkansas child welfare system provide foster care, supervised visitation services, a safe space for children to rest while waiting on a foster family and training for foster families.
To promote the social, emotional, spiritual and physical well being of children and their families throughout west virginia.
Our Mission is to create a better and safe environment for children, where they can have an opportunity to return to a more rewarding quality of life. Our goal is to effectively match the needs of each child in our care with appropriate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sherwood & Myrtie Foster's Home for Children and the most unlike its peers is Touch a Life Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESTORE HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds TOUCH-A-LIFE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds TOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Family Services ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EXCELLERATE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rick C & Belinda G Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.