Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richardson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$197kEducation$93kCrime & Legal$11kCommunity Improvement$8kInternational$7kHuman Services$6kCivil Rights$6kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$21,000
DENNISON MINISTRIES$10,000
PCA FOUNDATION$5,050
HIDEAWAY LAKE COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
ESPERANZA MINISTRIES$5,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$3,000
CASA DEL LAGO$2,500
PARK CITIES PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
CROSS WORLD$1,000
MATTHEW 101 MINISTRIES$1,000
OH BE JOYFUL CHURCH$990
TEXANS ON A MISSION$500
MISSION TO THE WORLD$500
PRACTICE MINISTRIES$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING ALTERNATIVES: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 13 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

$298k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+3%

Still filing today

38%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $57k · revenue +15%
  • EM
    ESPERANZA MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +321%
  • TM
    TEJAS MISSIONS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • TC
    TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • RC
    Redeemer City To Citygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +124%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
3
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
4
Truth Academy Inc

Truth academy works in partnership with families to integrate high-quality education with biblical truth and discipleship in order to train students, spiritually and academically, how to operate in their god-given purpose and live out a…

Religion
5
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
6
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
10
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
11
The Greatest School in West Houston

Christian pre-school from age 3-months to school-age, and school from

—
12
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Vitamin Bridge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIDE-A-WAY LAKE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $135,500 · OtherHIDE-A-WAY LAKE COMMUNITY CHURCHDENISON MINISTRIES: $31,000 · OtherDENISON MINISTRIESTEXAS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherTEXAS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY FOUNDATIONESPERANZA MINISTRIES: $14,000 · OtherESPERANZA MINISTRIESCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $11,000 · Other+14 more: $25,840 · Other+14 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $57,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACAD…WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3,750 · EducationWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY …+1 more: $500 · EducationRedeemer City To City: $5,000 · ReligionAMBASSADORS IMPACT NETWORK INC: $3,250 · Religion+2 more: $350 · ReligionTEJAS MISSIONS INC: $5,000 · HealthVitamin Bridge: $1,000 · HealthWACO ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementMomentous Institute: $503 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $500 · Youth DevelopmentAMAZON OUTREACH Inc: $1,000 · International
Other$243,340Education$66,250Religion$8,600Health$6,000Community Improvement$5,000Youth Development$1,003International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $57,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA MINISTRIES: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEJAS MISSIONS INC: $5,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetRedeemer City To City: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWACO ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMBASSADORS IMPACT NETWORK INC: $3,250 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAMAZON OUTREACH Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMomentous Institute: $503 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPractice Ministries Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetApartment Life Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TEJAS MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Redeemer City To City ↗
  • Who funds WACO ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMBASSADORS IMPACT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON OUTREACH Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vitamin Bridge ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Practice Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Apartment Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING ALTERNATIVES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Denman Family Foundation · Merrick Family Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Servant Foundation · The Leiser Family Foundation Inc · Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Signatry Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richardson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richardson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richardson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph