· Private foundation
Richard R Dossin Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM | $50,000 |
| LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND | $50,000 |
| DETROIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| EVERSIGHT | $20,000 |
| DE LA SALLE COLLEGIATE | $10,000 |
| MICHIGAN UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY DBA MI-UCP | $10,000 |
| BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC | $10,000 |
| GROSSE POINTE LIONS CHARITIES INC | $6,000 |
| I CARE OF MICHIGAN | $6,000 |
| LOVELAND INTER FAITH EFFORT INC (LIFE FOOD PANTRY) | $5,000 |
| GLORIA AND THOMAS KITCHEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST PETERS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH - EASTPOINTE | $5,000 |
| GROSSE POINTE LIONS CHARITIES INC | $5,000 |
| ST PAUL ON THE LAKE CATHOLIC CHURCH | $5,000 |
| MCLAREN MACOMB | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $235k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LDLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND6× · 2019–2025 · $230k · revenue +4%
Detroit Historical Society7× · 2018–2025 · $205k · revenue +57%- HFHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM4× · 2022–2025 · $145k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- MUMICHIGAN UNITED CEREBRAL PALSYone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +0%
- EEEVERSIGHT EYE BANKone grant, 2021 · $8k
- MMMCLAREN MACOMB FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
To receive and administer funds to support the mission of mclaren northern michigan and support programs that enhance the well-being of the community.
Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…
Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…
Creating healthy communities - together
Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Our mission is to help people to live longer, healthier lives with dignity, and to use all of our resources to give them everything they expect and deserve in comprehensive cardiovascular care for their families and themselves.
We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.
As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…
Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Karmanos Cancer Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Loveland Inter Faith Effort Inc Life Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds Detroit Historical Society ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Eversight ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ↗
- Who funds I CARE OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds KARMANOS CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLORIA AND THOMAS R KITCHEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds LOVELAND INTER FAITH EFFORT INC LIFE FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds GROSSE POINTE SHORES IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELLE ISLE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN MACOMB ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds WAYNE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MACOMB SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lynn & Paul Alandt Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard R Dossin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Richard R Dossin Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Richard R Dossin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.