Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard L Brewer and Susan J Brewer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$79kHuman Services$52kAnimals$50kEducation$12kReligion$12kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$237k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB FOR NEEDY$10,000
CATS HAVEN LTD$5,000
OPEN HEART KITCHEN$2,500
SHEPARDS GATE$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF HAMILTON COUNTY$2,000
ST CHRISTOPHER EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
FERTILE GROUND WORKS$1,500
INDIANA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC$1,200
HAWAIIAN WILDLIFE FUND$1,000
ALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION$1,000
APPALACHIAN OUTREACH$1,000
KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH: $1k → 18%Woodland Christmas Club: $10k → 5%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH: $1k → 18%Appalachian Outreach: $1k → 18%Woodland Christmas Club: $10k → 5%Appalachian Outreach: $1k → 18%Woodland Christmas Club: $10k → 5%Appalachian Outreach: $1k → 18%Woodland Christmas Club: $10k → 5%Appalachian Outreach: $1k → 18%Woodland Christmas Club: $10k → 5%Appalachian Outreach: $1k → 18%Woodland Christmas Club: $10k → 5%Appalachian Outreach: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
PA
CA
WV
VA
TN
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$219k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$219k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+68%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +40%
  • CH
    CATS HAVEN LTD
    7× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +15%
  • HS
    Humane Society for Hamilton County
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • IS
    Indiana State University
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • MM
    Mephibosheth Ministries Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +68%
  • TC
    T4TS CIO Livermore Pleaston Firefighers
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
2
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
3
Homeward Animal Shelter Inc

To care for, protect and place animals for adoption in life long homes, and to prevent cruelty to animals by educating our community in the proper and humane care of all animals.

Animals
4
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
6
Hiawatha Homes Inc

Provide residential, in-home, and community-based choices for people with disabilities.

—
7
Friendship Ark Inc

Friendship Ark, Inc. is a Faith-based, nonprofit corporation that provides HCBS residential waiver services to persons with intellectual disabilities

Housing & Shelter
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
A Christian Food Pantry Inc

Serve food to families and individuals in need.

—
10
Meals on Wheels of Hamilton County

Mowhc supports individuals who are elderly, disabled, and homebound by delivering nutritious meals, reducing hunger, improving health and promoting independence.

Food & Nutrition
11
Shepherd's Table Soup Kitchen Inc

To help feed those who are in need, without regard to age, race, sex, religion, or national origin.

Food & Nutrition
12
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Heart Kitchen of Livermore Inc; the most unlike its peers is Woodland Christmas Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB FOR NEEDY: $20,000 · OtherWOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB FOR NEEDYTri Valley Haven: $12,750 · OtherTri Valley HavenST CHRISTOPHER EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherST CHRISTOPHER EPISCOPAL CHURCHKK B Alumuni Fund: $9,000 · OtherKK B Alumuni FundSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,000 · OtherSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INCYMCA: $4,500 · OtherYMCAIndiana State University: $3,050 · Other+5 more: $9,100 · Other+5 moreWOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesWOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB INCAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INCCATS HAVEN LTD: $27,000 · AnimalsCATS HAVEN LTDHumane Society for Hamilton County: $16,000 · AnimalsHumane Society for Ha…OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HEAR…Fertile GroundWorks: $9,410 · Food & NutritionFertile G…HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND: $7,000 · EnvironmentALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthShepherds Gate: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterMephibosheth Ministries Inc: $1,000 · Religion
Other$76,400Human Services$68,000Animals$43,000Food & Nutrition$19,410Environment$7,000Health$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB INC: $60,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetCATS HAVEN LTD: $27,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFertile GroundWorks: $9,410 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII WILDLIFE FUND: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetShepherds Gate: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMephibosheth Ministries Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODLAND CHRISTMAS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CATS HAVEN LTD ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society for Hamilton County ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Fertile GroundWorks ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Shepherds Gate ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY ↗
  • Who funds Mephibosheth Ministries Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard L Brewer and Susan J Brewer Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard L Brewer and Susan J Brewer Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard L Brewer and Susan J Brewer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph