Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard E Woosnam Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$221kArts & Culture$69kAnimals$21kInternational$16kScience & Tech$10kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LYCOMING COLLEGE$10,000
WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL$6,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PHILADELPHIA ZOO$5,000
NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER$3,000
PAFA$3,000
BARNES FOUNDATION$2,500
1812 THEATRE$2,500
ARDEN THEATRE$2,000
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$1,500
ARTSPACE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
DELAWARE RIVER WATERFRONT$600
ENSEMBLE ARTS OF PHILADELPHIA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%PROJECT HOME: $500 → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500 → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500 → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500 → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$338k · 36 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
9

Total granted

$338k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+53%

Still filing today

50%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LYCOMING COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +27%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +7%
  • TF
    THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • W
    WAC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $800
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
3
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
4
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Philadelphia Contemporary

We connect the people and places of philadelphia through art and partnership. the organization is a free-standing platform that endeavors to show forward-thinking, high-quality contemporary visual and performance art in the city. the…

Human Services
7
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
8
The Rosenbach of the Free Library of Philadelphia

The rosenbach museum & library is a community that engages with and celebrates the art of the written word using our collection of rare books and manuscripts.

Arts & Culture
9
Association for Public Art

The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…

Arts & Culture
10
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zoological Society of Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Theatre Exile Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndiana University School of Medicine: $53,100 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicinePAFA: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherLYCOMING COLLEGE BOARD COMMITMENT: $10,000 · OtherIU - STUDENT EMERGENCY FUND: $10,000 · OtherARDEN THEATRE: $8,750 · OtherARTSPACE: $8,316 · Other1812 THEATRE: $7,624 · Other+25 more: $31,630 · Other+25 moreLYCOMING COLLEGE: $45,000 · EducationLYCOMING COLLE…THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $9,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN…THE BARNES FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BARNES F…NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $7,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CON…WALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION: $6,500 · Arts & CultureWALNUT STREE…PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $3,125 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA…THEATRE EXILE COMPANY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFRINGEARTS: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,110 · Arts & CultureZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $21,117 · AnimalsWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PITTSBURGH: $16,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE: $2,512 · EnvironmentPROJECT HOME: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$220,420Education$45,000Arts & Culture$38,235Animals$21,117International$16,000Environment$2,512Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $21,117 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PITTSBURGH: $16,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $3,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE: $2,512 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE EXILE COMPANY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRINGEARTS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE RIVER WATERFRONT CORPORATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE EXILE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds FRINGEARTS ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds KIMMEL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE RIVER WATERFRONT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · Independence Foundation · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard E Woosnam Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard E Woosnam Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard E Woosnam’s filings →

More from the funding graph