Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard and Ruth Lavine Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$618kEducation$431kArts & Culture$231kHuman Services$196kCivil Rights$85kFood & Nutrition$57kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $130k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
USC GOLD SCHOOL OF LAW$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$20,000
ST JOSEPHS CENTER$15,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$10,000
LA FIRE FOUNDATION$10,000
LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$10,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
UCLA LUSKIN SCHOOL$10,000
US AGAINST ALZHEIMERS$5,000
USC SHOAH FOUNDATION$5,000
THE BRENTWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
HARMONY PROJECT$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES$5,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED IN HARMONY: $5k → 14%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%UNITED IN HARMONY: $5k → 14%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%UNITED IN HARMONY: $2k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $2k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $3k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $2k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $1k → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $2k → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $2k → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $15k → 14%ST JOSEPHS CENTER: $15k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $3k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $3k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 47 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
19

Total granted

$1.6M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-1%

Still filing today

55%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $93k · revenue +48%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +28%
  • BS
    BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRENTWOOD FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • CM
    CABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -27%
  • EC
    EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER OF WILSHIRE BLVD TEMPLE
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel 818

Hillel 818 is the campus hub for all things Jewish at Cal State Northridge, Pierce College, LA Valley College, and throughout the San Fernando Valley. We empower our 6,000+ Jewish students to forge lasting friendships, grow as leaders,…

—
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Jewish Free Loan Association

The jewish free loan association of los angeles (jfla) offers interest-free loans on a non-sectarian basis to individuals and families whose needs are urgent and who may not qualify through normal financial resources. (see continuation on…

Unclassified
11
Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc

Simon wiesenthal center, inc. (the center) is a global jewish human rights activist organization that confronts anti-semitism, hate, stands with israel, defends the safety of jews worldwide, and teaches the lessons of the holocaust for…

Arts & Culture
12
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Kind Footprint. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/42
Grantees still filing
25/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $410,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUSC GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW: $170,000 · OtherUSC GOULD SCHOOL OF LAWUCLA LUSKIN SCHOOL: $41,000 · Other+55 more: $404,831 · Other+55 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $70,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAM…ST JOSEPH CENTER: $66,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH …UNITED IN HARMONY: $14,000 · Human ServicesUNITED IN …Angel City Alliance: $5,500 · Human Services+2 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $90,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELE…SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL C…CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $10,750 · Arts & CultureCENTER THE…+3 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $72,000 · EducationHarmony Project: $49,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $3,250 · EducationUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $46,000 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $29,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $27,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · HealthCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $92,500 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $12,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,025,831Human Services$163,500Arts & Culture$158,250Education$134,250Health$122,500Youth Development$107,000Philanthropy$56,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $92,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $72,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $66,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $49,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $46,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $27,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS: $19,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $14,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $10,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAngel City Alliance: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Center for Justice: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTIERRA S ANGELS: $4,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUNDS LIKE LA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBENEFACTORS OF THE JEWISH CLUB OF 1933 INC: $2,300 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH: $2,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHURCHILL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCU BOULDER HILLEL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTheatre of Hearts Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLE LYCEE FRANCAIS DE LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Hillel: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIND FOOTPRINT: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds Western Center on Law & Poverty Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA24.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Annenberg Foundation · Hyman Levine Family Foundation L'Dor V'Dor · Weingart Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Unger Family Foundation · Peter H and Marietta K Bach Charitable Trust Conservatorship · Maccabee Task Force Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Katz Family Foundation · Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard and Ruth Lavine Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard and Ruth Lavine Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard and Ruth Lavine Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard and Ruth Lavine Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard and Ruth Lavine Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph