Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard and Joanna Kreitzberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$263k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$405kEducation$342kInternational$101kFood & Nutrition$51kHealth$51kHousing & Shelter$51kHuman Services$51k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$12,702
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$60,000
BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL$25,200
MARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THE$12,712
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$12,710
OUR SUNDAY VISITOR$12,708
XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND$12,706
BENEDICTINE COLLEGE$12,704
ST MARYS MISSION$12,702
OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY$12,700
ASIAN RELIEF INC$12,676
MISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE$12,674
BASILICA OF THE NATIONAL SHRINE$12,672
COMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONY$12,658
MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC$12,656
SERAPHIC MASS ASSOCIATION$12,654
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST MARYS MISSION: $13k → 11%MARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THE: $13k → 9%OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY: $13k → 13%XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $13k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $13k → 13%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $13k → 15%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL: $25k → 14%OUR SUNDAY VISITOR: $13k → 13%MISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE: $13k → 11%COMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONY: $13k → 6%ASIAN RELIEF INC: $13k → 11%ST MARYS MISSION: $13k → 11%MARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THE: $13k → 9%OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY: $13k → 13%XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $13k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $13k → 13%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $13k → 15%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL: $25k → 14%OUR SUNDAY VISITOR: $13k → 13%MISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE: $13k → 11%COMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONY: $13k → 6%ASIAN RELIEF INC: $13k → 11%ST MARYS MISSION: $13k → 11%MARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THE: $13k → 9%OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY: $13k → 13%XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $13k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $13k → 13%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $13k → 15%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL: $25k → 14%OUR SUNDAY VISITOR: $13k → 13%MISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE: $13k → 11%COMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONY: $13k → 6%ASIAN RELIEF INC: $13k → 11%ST MARYS MISSION: $13k → 11%MARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THE: $13k → 9%OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY: $13k → 13%XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $13k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $13k → 13%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $13k → 15%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL: $25k → 14%OUR SUNDAY VISITOR: $13k → 13%MISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE: $13k → 11%COMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONY: $13k → 6%ASIAN RELIEF INC: $13k → 11%QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $60k → 14%QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $60k → 14%QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $60k → 14%QUEEN OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OR
IN
PA
NJ
MO
VA
MD
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$1.1M
$0

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Our Sunday Visitor Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +16%
  • XS
    XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +5%
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +13%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/7
    Grantees still filing
    6/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Queen of Peace School: $240,000 · OtherQueen of Peace SchoolBENEDICTINE SISTERS CORP: $100,800 · OtherBENEDICTINE SISTERS CORPMARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THE: $50,848 · OtherMARYKNOLL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF THEXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $50,824 · OtherXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLINDST MARYS MISSION: $50,808 · OtherST MARYS MISSIONOUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INC: $50,800 · OtherOUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INCMISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE INC: $50,696 · OtherMISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE INCBASILICA OF THE NATIONAL SHRINE: $50,688 · OtherBASILICA OF THE NATIONAL SHRINECOMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONY: $50,632 · OtherCOMPANIONS OF ST ANTHONYSERAPHIC MASS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,616 · OtherSERAPHIC MASS ASSOCIATION INCCAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN FRIARS: $50,576 · OtherCAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN FRIARSFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $50,840 · InternationalFOOD FOR T…SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $50,704 · InternationalSISTER OF …Our Sunday Visitor Inc: $50,832 · ReligionOur Sunday…MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $50,624 · ReligionMATER ECCL…Benedictine College: $50,816 · Education
    Other$797,288International$101,544Religion$101,456Education$50,816

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $50,840 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOur Sunday Visitor Inc: $50,832 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $50,824 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBenedictine College: $50,816 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $50,704 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $50,624 over 4y, 1.5% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
    • Who funds Our Sunday Visitor Inc ↗
    • Who funds XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
    • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
    • Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
    • Who funds MISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE INC ↗
    • Who funds MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The A&S Giancristofaro Family Foundation IncNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The A&S Giancristofaro Family Foundation Inc · B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Richard and Joanna Kreitzberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard and Joanna Kreitzberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard and Joanna Kreitzberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph