Skip to content
Richard Albert Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Richard Albert Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$53kInternational$30kHuman Services$27kFood & Nutrition$13kArts & Culture$6kEnvironment$5kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
4
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL$5,000
CROTON HARMON SCHOOLD DISTRICT$4,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$3,000
HENDRICK HUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,500
WOMR$1,000
WELFLEET HARBOUR ACTORS THEATRE$1,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$500
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER$400
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$265
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$100
ADOPT A DOG$100
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$100
CROTON CARING COMMITTEE$100
CROTON POLICE ASSOC$100
SALVATION ARMY$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE COVE: $200 → 17%THE LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%THE LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%THE LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%THE LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%THE LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $75 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $75 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CT
MD
AR
TN
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 22 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$111k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+30%

Still filing today

59%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RE SOURCES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +11%
  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +31%
  • CC
    CROTON CARING COMMITTEE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • CP
    Cookstove Project Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES FEEDING AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Connect Co

At food connect, we're dedicated to bridging the gaps in our food system, working to end hunger and fostering healthier communities through our innovative initiatives and programs. we build scalable technologies that support last-mile…

Food & Nutrition
2
Ny Community Fridge Corp

Using the power of volunteers and community partnerships to expand dignified access to food in the heart of disadvantaged communities.

Food & Nutrition
3
Connecticut Foodshare Inc

The mission of the connecticut foodshare is to deliver an informed and equitable response to hunger by mobilizing community partners, volunteers, and supporters.

—
4
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
6
Corning Meals on Wheels Inc

To provide nutritious meals for homebound individuals who are ill, elderly.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Community Kitchen Inc

The community kitchen is a direct-service united way agency providing healthy and nourishing hot meals and take-home boxes and advocacy to low and moderate income individuals and families in the monadnock region.

Food & Nutrition
8
Ossining Food Pantry

Feeding the hungry and providing food assistance to needy families.

Human Services
9
Meals-On-Wheels Inc

To provide meals to the elderly, sick & disabled in the town of greenwich, ct.

—
10
Central Ma Food Rescue Inc

Full belly foods purchases food from farms and wholesalers and donates the food to low-income communities across the country.

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
12
Tompkins County Spca

The mission of the SPCA of Tompkins County is to protect companion animals. We are a no-kill shelter dedicated to preventing animal cruelty and overpopulation. We promote responsible pet stewardship by providing education, counseling and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Croton Caring Committee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROTON HARMON SCHOOLD DISTRICT: $32,000 · OtherCROTON HARMON SCHOOLD DISTRICTHENDRICK HUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherHENDRICK HUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICTHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $4,825 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALWELFLEET HARBOUR ACTORS THEATRE: $4,500 · OtherWELFLEET HARBOUR ACTORS THEATRE+20 more: $17,589 · Other+20 moreLOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC: $25,000 · Human ServicesLOWER CAPE OUTREACH…+2 more: $550 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $25,000 · InternationalSave The Children F…CROTON-CORTLANDT FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $929 · Food & NutritionSOUP KITCHEN IN PROVINCETOWNINC: $500 · Food & NutritionBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400 · HealthRE SOURCES: $1,800 · EnvironmentTHE TRURO CONSERVATION TRUST: $1,500 · EnvironmentCROTON COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $600 · AnimalsADOPT-A-DOG INC: $100 · Animals
Other$78,914Human Services$25,550International$25,000Food & Nutrition$8,929Health$3,400Environment$3,300Education$1,000Animals$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCROTON-CORTLANDT FOOD PANTRY: $7,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRE SOURCES: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROTON CARING COMMITTEE INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRURO CONSERVATION TRUST: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCookstove Project Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCROTON COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $929 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROTON POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMANSFIELD EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUP KITCHEN IN PROVINCETOWNINC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COVE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT-A-DOG INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC ↗
  • Who funds CROTON-CORTLANDT FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds RE SOURCES ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROTON CARING COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRURO CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Cookstove Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROTON COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds CROTON POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANSFIELD EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUP KITCHEN IN PROVINCETOWNINC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COVE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT-A-DOG INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ge Aerospace FoundationCT13.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard Albert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard Albert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard Albert Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Richard Albert Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard Albert Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home