Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rice Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$690k
Granted FY2025still arriving
70
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$1.2MReligion$751kEnvironment$686kHuman Services$657kHealth$544kArts & Culture$530kRecreation & Sports$403kAnimals$147kOther$0
02FY2025 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $139k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $551k
$6,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MADISON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$40,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF PETOSKEY$40,000
MINNEHAHA ACADEMY$40,000
SALVATION ARMY OF MINNESOTA - NORTHERN DIVISION$30,000
ASU FOUNDATION$25,000
SALEM COVENANT CHURCH$20,000
MC LAX ASSOCIATION - WOLFPACK LACROSSE$20,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC$20,000
ELEPHANT VOICES$20,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND CLINICS OF MINNESOTA$20,000
NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC$18,000
ST PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$18,000
NATIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION$16,000
SMITH COLLEGE$15,000
TWIN CITIES OPERA GUILD$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WATSON'S CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $3k → 9%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $8k → 10%WATSON'S CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $3k → 9%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $3k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $3k → 10%HELPLINE HOUSE: $4k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%BAINBRIDGE YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%HELPLINE HOUSE: $3k → 10%YWCA MISSOULA: $3k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $18k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE HAGER HOUSE: $2k → 11%HELPLINE HOUSE: $3k → 10%THE HAGER HOUSE: $2k → 11%HELPLINE HOUSE: $3k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 9%HELPLINE HOUSE: $3k → 10%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $5k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 9%HELPLINE HOUSE: $3k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 9%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $5k → 9%BAINBRIDGE YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 10%NORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC: $3k → 9%BAINBRIDGE YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $3k → 9%HELPLINE HOUSE: $2k → 10%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 14%BAINBRIDGE YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 10%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 14%JOURNEYCARE: $16k → 14%JOURNEYCARE: $14k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 14%JOURNEYCARE: $6k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 133 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

133 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2025, 68 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

133
24

Total granted

$5.5M
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+12%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MINNEHAHA ACADEMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +9%
  • TS
    The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +16%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • FC
    FLINT CREEK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • MG
    MIDDLETON GATOR SWIM & DIVE TEAM
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Conservation Minnesota

Conservation minnesota's mission is to turn our shared conservation values into state priorities and provide you with the information you need to make decisions for your family, community and future.

Environment
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
10
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
11
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsYmca Youth DevelopmentFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Youth CampsPolicy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development ServicesSchool District FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%41%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/110
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,455

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
93/96
Grantees still filing
72/96
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY CHURCH OF BARRINGTON — $302,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH OF BARRINGTONCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $226,000 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INCMINNEHAHA ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND — $145,000 · Other+111 more — $2,619,500 · Other+111 moreMINNEHAHA ACADEMY — $180,000 · EducationMINNEHAHA ACADEM…THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $134,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF …MADISON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $110,000 · EducationMADISON COUNTRY …ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $95,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UN…PEO Foundation — $93,000 · EducationPEO FoundationHOPE COLLEGE — $61,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGENORTH PARK UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · Education+6 more — $93,000 · Education+6 moreCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $146,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $109,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $55,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $42,000 · HealthCASTING 4 A CURE INC — $27,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $21,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $15,000 · Health+3 more — $16,000 · HealthNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $109,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC — $109,000 · EnvironmentLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $83,000 · EnvironmentFLINT CREEK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION — $35,000 · EnvironmentCITIZENS FOR CONSERVATION INC — $26,000 · EnvironmentFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST — $18,000 · Environment+3 more — $15,500 · EnvironmentBARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $93,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $55,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HOMES — $40,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $37,500 · Human ServicesElea Institute — $36,000 · Human ServicesNORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC — $31,000 · Human ServicesHELPLINE HOUSE — $22,500 · Human ServicesWomens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc — $18,000 · Human Services+5 more — $27,500 · Human ServicesThe Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society — $168,000 · Arts & CultureTwin Cities Opera Guild — $101,000 · Arts & CultureSPARE KEY — $64,000 · Community ImprovementISLAND VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS — $22,500 · Community ImprovementBOULDER JUNCTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,292,500Education$806,000Health$431,500Environment$395,500Human Services$361,000Arts & Culture$269,000Community Improvement$102,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $226,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY — $180,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society — $168,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $146,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $134,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $110,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $109,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC — $109,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $109,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $102,000 over 9y, 31% of budgetTwin Cities Opera Guild — $101,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $93,500 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetPEO Foundation — $93,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $83,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $79,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCalvin Christian School of Minneapolis — $72,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $66,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSPARE KEY — $64,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICA SHARE USA INC — $63,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE — $61,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $55,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT — $52,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetELEPHANTVOICES — $50,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetEVERY MEAL — $49,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEarthcorps — $46,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER — $45,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HOMES — $40,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $37,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetElea Institute — $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLINT CREEK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION — $35,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetNORTHMEN DEN YOUTH PANTRIES INC — $31,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK — $31,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $29,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASTING 4 A CURE INC — $27,500 over 8y, 20% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $27,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCITIZENS FOR CONSERVATION INC — $26,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University — $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELPLINE HOUSE — $22,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetISLAND VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS — $22,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBAINBRIDGE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAU SABLE INSTITUTE — $18,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEHAHA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Twin Cities Opera Guild ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds PEO Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SPARE KEY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA SHARE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds ELEPHANTVOICES ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
  • Who funds Earthcorps ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Community Foundation …Otto Bremer TrustIncrediblebank Founda…Judd S Alexander Foun…One Call for AllBa & Esther Greenheck…Montana Community Fou…Wisconsin Public Serv…Baird Foundation IncChurch Mutual Insuran…Run Wild Missoula IncClovis Foundation
Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin IncWI25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Judd S Alexander Foundation · One Call for All · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Run Wild Missoula Inc · Clovis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rice Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home