Skip to content
Rhm Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rhm Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2026still arriving
43
Grants FY2026still arriving
20
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Religion$55kArts & Culture$40kPhilanthropy$27kEnvironment$26kAnimals$19kFood & Nutrition$17kHousing & Shelter$11kInternational$11kOther$0
02FY2026 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
20
States reached
$374k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COTS$3,000
CHAMPLAIN HOUSING TRUST$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
VERMONT PUBLIC RADIO$3,000
MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT$2,500
KENYON COLLEGE$1,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$1,000
OCEAN CONSERVACY$750
NO KID HUNGRY$750
BABY RHINO RESCUE$750
CONNECTICUT PUBLIC$750
CARTER RESERVOIR MUSTANG INC$750
TURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE$500
NRDC$500
ASPCA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$171k · 28 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2026, 15 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
46

Total granted

$171k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

79%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • GI
    GREENPEACE INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +22%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2022–2026 · $3k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • LM
    LAKEWOOD MINYAN (BROOKLYN SYNAGOGUE)
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • VF
    VERMONT FOODBANK
    one grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • VP
    VERMONT PUBLIC CO
    one grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
7
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
8
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
9
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
10
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/74
Grantees still filing
42/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINYAN VASIKIN OF FLATBUSH: $48,000 · OtherMINYAN VASIKIN OF FLATBUSHMISC CHARITABLE DONATION: $25,450 · OtherMISC CHARITABLE DONATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+50 more: $71,400 · Other+50 moreWNET: $15,500 · Arts & CultureWNETNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 · Arts & CultureThe United Stat…VERMONT PUBLIC CO: $3,000 · Arts & CultureVERMONT PUBLIC …THE CIVIC STANDARD INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CIVIC STAND…+3 more: $2,600 · Arts & Culture+3 moreCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $8,224 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FOODBANK: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $1,500 · Food & NutritionOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $4,750 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,750 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,250 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $1,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $500 · Environment+3 more: $750 · EnvironmentCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterCHAMPLAIN HOUSING TRUST: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE DOE FUND INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterHIAS INC: $4,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $2,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,250 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $500 · InternationalHAPPY LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $2,500 · AnimalsCarter Reservoir Mustangs Inc Carter Reservoir Mustangs Registry: $750 · AnimalsBABY RHINO RESCUE: $750 · AnimalsWHITE WOLF SANCTUARY: $500 · AnimalsTURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC: $500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $500 · Animals+12 more: $3,000 · Animals
Other$155,350Arts & Culture$33,100Food & Nutrition$16,724Environment$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000International$9,750Animals$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWNET: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $8,224 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $4,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT PUBLIC CO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan and Ford Sc…Surendra and Karen Gu…Bradford Family Found…Joyce a Ward Foundati…Ratna Sabapathy Famil…The Edward E Hills Fu…PC Fund for Animals C…The Gloria and Jacqui…Amg Charitable Gift F…Edwin D Marks Animal …The McGrath Family Ch…Austen-Stokes Ancient…
The Susan and Ford Schumann FoundationAZ26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Ratna Sabapathy Family Foundation I · The Edward E Hills Fund · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · The McGrath Family Charitable Foundation · Austen-Stokes Ancient Americas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rhm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rhm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Champlain Housing Trust: 15% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Vermont Public Co: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rhm Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rhm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rhm’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home