Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$4,350
Organizations funded a year
3 to 19
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$94k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
AnimalsInternationalCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$7k100%
FY20233$6k100%
FY202219$5k95%
FY20218$800n/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Animals$7kEnvironment$5kReligion$5kInternational$2kPhilanthropy$550Crime & Legal$275Civil Rights$275Health$200Other$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Healy Pack Senior Gsd Sanctuary Inc$4,3501n/a
Ocean Conservancy$2,50010%
The Mustard Seed Project$2,00010%
Colel Chabad$2,0001n/a
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$37520%
Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children$27510%
The Arabian Rescue Mission Inc$27510%
American Forests$27510%
Kupas Rabbeinu$2751n/a
Animal Equality$27510%
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Healy Pack Senior Gsd Sanctuary Inc$4,3501n/a
Ocean Conservancy$2,50010%
The Mustard Seed Project$2,00010%
Colel Chabad$2,0001n/a
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$37520%
Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children$27510%
The Arabian Rescue Mission Inc$27510%
American Forests$27510%
Kupas Rabbeinu$2751n/a
Animal Equality$27510%
American Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc$27510%
International Fund for Animal Welfare Inc$27510%
White Wolf Sanctuary$27510%
Wounded Paw Project$27510%
Smiling Dog Farms$27510%
Baby Rhino Rescue$27510%
Chmol Inc$2751n/a
Noah's Lost Ark Inc$27510%
Castleton Ranch Horse Rescue Inc$10010%
National Jewish Health$10010%
Bl Girls Town Jerusalem Inc$10010%
The Trust for Public Land$10010%
Keepers of the Wild$10010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($4k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOcean Conservancy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mustard Seed Project: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arabian Rescue Mission Inc: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Forests: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Equality: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Committee for Sanz Institutions in Israel Inc: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Fund for Animal Welfare Inc: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Wolf Sanctuary: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWounded Paw Project: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmiling Dog Farms: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaby Rhino Rescue: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoah's Lost Ark Inc: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCastleton Ranch Horse Rescue Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Jewish Health: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBl Girls Town Jerusalem Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trust for Public Land: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeepers of the Wild: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc FoundationMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Joselow Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Farrell Family Foundation · Rhm Foundation Inc · Ratna Sabapathy Family Foundation I · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation with peer funders

About The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation

How much does The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation give?
The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation reported 3 grants totaling $9,350 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 19 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (35%), Environment (25%), Religion (21%).
Who are The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Healy Pack Senior Gsd Sanctuary Inc ($4k), Ocean Conservancy ($3k), The Mustard Seed Project ($2k).
Does The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation, Joyce a Ward Foundation, Bradford Family Foundation.
Where is The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation based?
The Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman Foundation is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gloria and Jacquin D Bierman’s filings →

More from the funding graph