Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rex and Nelle Jackson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$434kEnvironment$150kEducation$132kHuman Services$117kHealth$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kRecreation & Sports$21kHousing & Shelter$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $52k
$4,303
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION$20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$20,000
ST EDWARD CATHOLIC SCHOOL$12,178
OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$8,877
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$7,363
CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE$6,728
PEORIA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$6,728
ST MARY'S GRADE SCHOOL$5,828
PETS FOR SENIORS$5,148
CAMP DALLAS$5,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$4,968
PET PARTNERS$4,303
NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUND$4,303
MILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$4,193
PAWS GIVING INDEPENDENCE$4,027
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $1k → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $1k → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $1k → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $500 → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $500 → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $500 → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $500 → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%MOLLY BEARS: $485 → 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $2k → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $950 → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $950 → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $950 → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $950 → 14%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $920 → 14%PETS FOR SENIORS: $4k → 14%PETS FOR SENIORS: $3k → 14%PETS FOR SENIORS: $3k → 14%PETS FOR SENIORS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$895k · 30 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
1

Total granted

$895k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+148%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $162k · revenue +73%
  • OH
    OSF Healthcare Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +95%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARKgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +148%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
2
Peoria Humane Society

To promote humane treatment of all animals within the community

Animals
3
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
4
Illinois Animal Welfare Networkers Association
Animals
5
Spay Illinois Pet Well Clinics Inc

Our mission is to end pet homelessness by empowering pet owners and shelters with the resources that they need to be successful.

Animals
6
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
7
Paws - Preservation of Animal Welfare & Safety Inc

The organization is a no-kill animal rescue. paws saves lives and prevents suffering by implementing the no-kill philosophy through aggressive spay/neuter programs for owned and unowned animals. this is accomplished by rescuing, fostering,…

Animals
8
Pixie's Animal Welfare Society

The primary focus of pixie's animal welfare society (paws) is as an animal rescue group promoting 100% sterilization of companion animals in order to reduce or eliminate the number of unwanted and homeless pets. the secondary focus is on…

Animals
9
Minn-Kota Paaws People Advocating Animal Welfare Services

To offer financial assistance to individuals to aid them in spaying/neuter companion animals and to decrease the number of animals euthanized at local pounds.

Animals
10
Paws Chicago

Paws chicago is a national leader in the no kill animal welfare movement, helping more than 23,842 homeless and at-risk pets each year through comprehensive spay/neuter, medical, and adoption programs.

Animals
11
Humane Society of Southern Illinoisspca Inc

Prevention of cruelty to animals

Animals
12
Illinois Shorthair Rescue

Rescue and rehoming of German Shorthaired Pointers

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morris Animal Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $149,020 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYST EDWARD CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $95,898 · OtherST EDWARD CATHOLIC SCHOOLWOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $50,158 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTERTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $49,998 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSEST MARY'S GRADE SCHOOL: $32,218 · OtherST MARY'S GRADE SCHOOLPaws Giving Independence: $27,267 · OtherPaws Giving Independence+7 more: $35,870 · Other+7 moreMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $162,190 · AnimalsMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATIONPEORIA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $49,998 · AnimalsPEORIA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYPET PARTNERS: $29,308 · AnimalsPET PARTNERSMILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $27,098 · AnimalsMILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYA R K Humane Society Ltd: $24,037 · AnimalsA R K Humane Society LtdDogs on Deployment: $21,228 · AnimalsDogs on DeploymentHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $20,403 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL ILLINOISFRIENDS OF STRAYS INC: $15,858 · AnimalsSTRAY ANIMAL MIDWAY SHELTER: $14,105 · Animals+1 more: $8,658 · AnimalsOSF Healthcare Foundation: $60,067 · HealthOSF Healthca…NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $29,308 · HealthNATIONAL DIS…EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $22,538 · HealthEASTERSEALS …Pets for Seniors: $34,168 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $27,333 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $10,118 · Human ServicesMolly Bears: $6,235 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $19,203 · Community ImprovementPeoria Youth Hockey Association: $13,763 · Youth DevelopmentKABOOM INC: $13,742 · Recreation & Sports
Other$440,429Animals$372,883Health$111,913Human Services$77,854Community Improvement$19,203Youth Development$13,763Recreation & Sports$13,742

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $162,190 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $149,020 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation: $60,067 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $49,998 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPEORIA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $49,998 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetPets for Seniors: $34,168 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $29,308 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPET PARTNERS: $29,308 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $27,333 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPaws Giving Independence: $27,267 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetMILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $27,098 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetA R K Humane Society Ltd: $24,037 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $22,538 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDogs on Deployment: $21,228 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $20,403 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $19,203 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF STRAYS INC: $15,858 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSTRAY ANIMAL MIDWAY SHELTER: $14,105 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetPeoria Youth Hockey Association: $13,763 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetKABOOM INC: $13,742 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $10,118 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DANIEL J ELIAS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $8,658 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetMolly Bears: $6,235 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds PEORIA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Pets for Seniors ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PET PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Paws Giving Independence ↗
  • Who funds MILLER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds A R K Humane Society Ltd ↗
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds Dogs on Deployment ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF STRAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds STRAY ANIMAL MIDWAY SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Peoria Youth Hockey Association ↗
  • Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE DANIEL J ELIAS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Molly Bears ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoria Area Community FoundationIL19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoria Area Community Foundation · The Bielfeldt Foundation · Barton Family Foundation Dtd 4242013 · Heart of Illinois United Way Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rex and Nelle Jackson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rex and Nelle Jackson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rex and Nelle Jackson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rex and Nelle Jackson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rex and Nelle Jackson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph