Skip to content
Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives at a glance

· Private foundation

Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$606kEnvironment$525kYouth Development$293kHuman Services$85k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
MN
NV
CA
UT
CO
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Giveslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$1.4M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+20%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    Scholastic Shooting Sports Foundation Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $249k · revenue +28%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $240k · revenue +169%
  • DE
    DALLAS ECOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • ED
    Eco Defense Group
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • PT
    PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +20%
  • EA
    EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
2
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
3
Outdoor Equity Alliance

To create equitable access to nature in all communities and inspire a diverse new generation of environmental leaders.

Food & Nutrition
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
6
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
7
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
8
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
9
Venture Free Foundation

Outdoor Adventure and Environmental Leadership Programs

Youth Development
10
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
11
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
12
United States Skiing Foundation

United states skiing foundation is engaged in not-for-profit membership, competition, training, development, and educational activities related to amateur skiers and snowboarders who are, or aspire to become, members of the u.s. ski and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Forest Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pedal Power. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Scholastic Shooting Sports Foundation Inc: $249,000 · Recreation & SportsScholastic Shooting Sports Foundation IncNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $240,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATIONInternational Mountain Bicycling Association: $185,000 · Recreation & SportsInternational Mountain Bicycling AssociationPEDAL POWER: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsPEDAL POWERNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $57,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILITY CENTERPGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsBellas Mentoring Inc: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentBellas Mentoring IncYouth Seen: $142,500 · Youth DevelopmentYouth SeenDALLAS ECOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EnvironmentDALLAS ECOLOGICAL …PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $95,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WINTER…Eco Defense Group: $40,000 · AnimalsWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · HealthEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Recreation & Sports$846,000Youth Development$292,500Environment$245,000Animals$40,000Health$35,000Human Services$30,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScholastic Shooting Sports Foundation Inc: $249,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $240,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Mountain Bicycling Association: $185,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetDALLAS ECOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetBellas Mentoring Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetYouth Seen: $142,500 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $95,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPEDAL POWER: $75,000 over 3y, 66% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $57,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEco Defense Group: $40,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives?

    Find your warmest path to Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Revelyst Corporate Foundation dba Revelyst Gives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home