Skip to content
Restoreus Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Restoreus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$189kHuman Services$92kEducation$49kReligion$30kPublic Benefit$29kHousing & Shelter$12kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$12,767
Median grant
2
States reached
$201k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS SMALL EVENTS$12,767
Individual grant recipient$1,766
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREEN HILLS FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 14%GREEN HILLS FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 14%THE SINGLETON'S: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NV
IN
OH
CA
UT
NE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 17 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
26

Total granted

$437k
$287k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
+36%

Still filing today

6%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $113k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $80k
  • VS
    VARIOUS SMALL EVENTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $76k

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue +50%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $74k
  • CF
    COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $29k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
2
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
3
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
4
M Family Foundation

The m family foundation was founded to fund research, promote early detection, educate the community and assist families impacted by ovarian or pediatric cancer.

Philanthropy
5
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
6
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
7
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
8
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
9
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
10
Project Purple Inc

The mission of project purple is to raise awareness and funds toward a cure of pancreatic cancer. in addition, project purple motivates people to run in world renowned marathons and half marathons to raise mission critical funds.

Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Singletons; the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $113,090 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $79,670 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS SMALL EVENTS: $75,870 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL EVENTSIndividual grant recipient: $73,819 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $36,856 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE FOR EVERY HEART: $30,000 · OtherHOPE FOR EVERY HEARTIndividual grant recipient: $23,746 · Other+26 more: $125,285 · Other+26 moreTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC: $79,500 · HealthTHE BRETT BOYE…WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE C…50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 · Health50 MILE MARCH …COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY: $29,000 · Public BenefitYoung Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273): $14,000 · Human ServicesTHE SINGLETONS: $5,000 · Human ServicesBRIAN MUHA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPELOTONIA: $6,000 · EducationPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC: $2,089 · Youth Development
Other$558,336Health$94,900Public Benefit$29,000Human Services$19,000Philanthropy$10,000Education$6,000Public Safety & Disaster$6,000Youth Development$2,089

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC: $79,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY: $29,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273): $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAN MUHA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPELOTONIA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC: $2,089 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee (6273) ↗
  • Who funds BRIAN MUHA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds 50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SINGLETONS ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Restoreus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Restoreus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Restoreus Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Restoreus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Restoreus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home