Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Restoreus Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$189kHuman Services$92kEducation$49kReligion$30kPublic Benefit$29kHousing & Shelter$12kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$5,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$232k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS SMALL EVENTS$15,964
THE 50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION$5,400
Individual grant recipient$998
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE SINGLETON'S: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NV
IN
OH
CA
UT
NE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$422k · 17 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$422k
$282k

Still filing today

0%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $113k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $80k
  • VS
    VARIOUS SMALL EVENTS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $63k

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue +50%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $74k
  • CF
    COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $29k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

2
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
3
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

4
National Pediatric Cancer Foundation Inc

National pediatric cancer foundation (npcf) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to funding research to eliminate childhood cancer. our focus is to fund research to find less toxic, more targeted therapies by partnering with leading…

Health
5
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
6
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
7
Lets Win Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

Let's Win Pancreatic Cancer Foundation (the Organization") is a go-to resource that guides patients and caregivers with vital information for better outcomes. Through a dynamic online platform available in English and Spanish, everyone who…

Health
8
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
9
Polybio Research Foundation Inc

We are a 501(c)3 transforming how complex chronic conditions like longcovid, me/cfs & post treatment lyme disease are studied, diagnosed, and treated. polybio was founded by three scientists with complementary expertise (neuroscience,…

10
The Morgan Adams Foundation

To fund critically needed pediatric oncology research

Health
11
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

12
The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research (Us) Ltd

Partner with scientists to accelerate research that will transform the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer through ground breaking science carried out by individual investigators, multidisciplinary teams, and early stage…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pelotonia and the most unlike its peers is Brian Muha Memorial Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $113,090 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $79,670 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $73,819 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS SMALL EVENTS — $63,103 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL EVENTSIndividual grant recipient — $36,856 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE FOR EVERY HEART — $30,000 · OtherHOPE FOR EVERY HEARTIndividual grant recipient — $23,746 · Other+27 more — $137,519 · Other+27 moreTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC — $79,500 · HealthTHE BRETT BOYER…WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $10,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CE…50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,400 · Health50 MILE MARCH F…COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY — $29,000 · Public BenefitBRIAN MUHA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyPELOTONIA — $6,000 · EducationPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE SINGLETONS — $5,000 · Human ServicesMARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC — $2,089 · Youth Development
Other$557,803Health$94,900Public Benefit$29,000Philanthropy$10,000Education$6,000Public Safety & Disaster$6,000Human Services$5,000Youth Development$2,089

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC — $79,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY — $29,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIAN MUHA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPELOTONIA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC — $2,089 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds BRIAN MUHA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PELOTONIA
  • Who funds 50 MILE MARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE SINGLETONS
  • Who funds PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Restoreus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Restoreus Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Restoreus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph