Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Restaurant Workers' Community Foundation Inc

The nbsp;primary nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;the nbsp;organization nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;grow nbsp;the nbsp;power nbsp;of nbsp;restaurant nbsp;workers nbsp;in nbsp;public nbsp;disclosure nbsp;and nbsp;workplace nbsp;poicies nbsp;on nbsp;wages nbsp;equity nbsp;and nbsp;health

$886k
Granted FY2022
20
Grants FY2022
12
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2022.

Arts & Culture$822kCommunity Improvement$465kPhilanthropy$340kHealth$320kEmployment$285kFood & Nutrition$201kHuman Services$150kCivil Rights$75kOther$0
02FY2022 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $241k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$15,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$977k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASCENDUS$375,000
SOUTHERN SMOKE$141,000
THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE$50,000
THE BIG TABLE$50,000
TINY SEED PROJECT INC$35,000
STUDIO ATAO INC$35,000
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE FISCAL SPONSOR FO QUEER FOOD FOUNDATION$35,000
IN THE WEEDS INC$35,000
LA COCINA$15,000
EMMA'S TORCH$15,000
RESTAURANT AFTER HOURS$10,000
SAFE BARS INC$10,000
I'LL HAVE WHAT SHE'S HAVING$10,000
PILOT LIGHT$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANOTHER ROUND ANOTHER RALLY: $20k → 11%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 12%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $30k → 20%EMMA'S TORCH: $30k → 20%EMMA'S TORCH: $15k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
CO
MD
AZ
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Restaurant Workers' Community Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Restaurant Workers' Community Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 15 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$1.6M
$686k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
-6%

Still filing today

87%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $440k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +35%
  • TINY SEED PROJECT INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +515%
  • CH
    Culinary Hospitality Outreach and Wellness
    3× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +672%

Funded once

  • KW
    Khesed Wellness a Colorado Nonprofit DBA Kind Therapy Incgraduated
    2× · 2020–2021 · $125k · revenue +180%
  • OF
    ONE FAIR WAGE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $85k · revenue -23%
  • MP
    MELTING POT FOUNDATION USA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Turning Tables

Turning tables was built by industry mentors and introduced to new orleans with its first graduating class of externs in 2019. what we found that year was a thirst for community within the hospitality industry among black and brown…

Employment
2
Food Jobs Work Foundation
Employment
3
Brandworkers International Inc

Brandworkers is a non-profit organization of local food-making workers coming together for a good job and sustainable food system.

Civil Rights
4
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
5
Feast Collective

Feast Collective elevates and empowers immigrants and former refugees as leaders. We use international cuisine as a platform for economic resilience, holistic growth, and culture-sharing.

Employment
6
Fork Food Lab

Fork Food Lab is a nonprofit food business incubator and shared commercial kitchen focused on growing the local food economy. We support the growth of sustainable Maine-based businesses by providing entrepreneurs with work space,…

Environment
7
The Momentum Group Create Common Good

We use food to change lives and build healty communities. our foodservice job-training programs help people with barriers to employment achieve self-sufficiency by marrying their talents to the needs of the community.

Religion
8
Project Restart Inc

Our mission is to help people return to independent living and be self-sufficient. The HWH model is partner based and encompasses housing, mental health services, workforce training and employment. This supportive structure and services…

Housing & Shelter
9
La Cocina Va

To use food to generate workforce & economic development in minority communities through culinary arts, job readiness training, vocational instruction, life skills development, job placement, & safety certifications.

Food & Nutrition
10
Friends of Codeys Nola

Dedicated to empowering food on entrepreneurs on their journey to scale by building bridges to education, collaboration, and capital.

Food & Nutrition
11
Pathways Kitchen

Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward

Crime & Legal
12
Kitchen Work Foundation

Provides financial support and mentorship to food entrepreneurs, matching them with funding and providing access to experienced professionals as they embark on establishing new restaurants, markets, cafes, bakeries, and other local food…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lee Initiative Inc and the most unlike its peers is Studio Atao. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Addiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesFaith-Based Social Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%42%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%57%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
8%
5/59
the rest of the field
13%
240,391/1,819,506

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/53
Grantees still filing
24/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Southern Smoke Foundation — $752,000 · Arts & CultureSouthern Smoke FoundationSTUDIO ATAO — $55,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO ATAO+1 more — $15,000 · Arts & CultureASCENDUS INC — $375,000 · Community ImprovementASCENDUS INCLA COCINA — $50,000 · Community ImprovementLA COCINAIN THE WEEDS INC — $45,000 · Community ImprovementIN THE WEEDS INCTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $150,250 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING KIT…The Big Table — $150,000 · PhilanthropyThe Big TableCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FO…THE MIGRANT KITCHEN INCORPORATED — $21,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIGRANT KI…SAINT CITY CULINARY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherSAINT CITY CULINARY FOUNDA…FESTEVENTS FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherFESTEVENTS FOUNDATIONRESTAURANT AFTER HOURS INC — $40,000 · OtherRESTAURANT AFTER HOURS INCSERVING THOSE SERVING — $30,000 · OtherNO US WITHOUT YOU LA — $30,000 · OtherSUPPORT STAFF — $30,000 · OtherFLORECIENDO — $40,000 · OtherFLORECIENDOTransCanWork Inc — $40,000 · OtherTransCanWork IncDRIVE CHANGE INC — $30,000 · OtherMELTING POT FOUNDATION USA INC — $60,000 · OtherMELTING POT FOUNDATION USA…Alliance for Global Justice Corp — $45,000 · OtherAlliance for Global Justic…TINY SEED PROJECT INC — $45,000 · OtherTINY SEED PROJECT INCGood Work Austin — $40,000 · OtherGood Work AustinPRO BONO NET INC — $35,000 · OtherPRO BONO NET INC+3 more — $45,000 · Other+3 moreKhesed Wellness a Colorado Nonprofit DBA Kind Therapy Inc — $125,000 · HealthKhesed We…Culinary Hospitality Outreach and Wellness — $40,000 · HealthCulinary …BEN'S FRIENDS — $40,000 · HealthBEN'S FRI…I'll Have What She's Having — $30,000 · HealthI'll Have…PILOT LIGHT — $10,000 · HealthEMMA'S TORCH LTD — $45,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $30,000 · Human ServicesANOTHER ROUND ANOTHER RALLY — $20,000 · Human ServicesONE FAIR WAGE INC — $85,000 · Civil RightsMARCH ON MARYLAND — $20,000 · Civil RightsSAFE BARS INC — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$822,000Community Improvement$470,000Philanthropy$361,250Other$650,000Health$245,000Human Services$125,000Civil Rights$115,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSouthern Smoke Foundation — $752,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetASCENDUS INC — $375,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $150,250 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetThe Big Table — $150,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetKhesed Wellness a Colorado Nonprofit DBA Kind Therapy Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC — $85,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMELTING POT FOUNDATION USA INC — $60,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSTUDIO ATAO — $55,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetLA COCINA — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIN THE WEEDS INC — $45,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTINY SEED PROJECT INC — $45,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCulinary Hospitality Outreach and Wellness — $40,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetGood Work Austin — $40,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetBEN'S FRIENDS — $40,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetFLORECIENDO — $40,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetTransCanWork Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetPRO BONO NET INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDRIVE CHANGE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSUPPORT STAFF — $30,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetI'll Have What She's Having — $30,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MIGRANT KITCHEN INCORPORATED — $21,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetANOTHER ROUND ANOTHER RALLY — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMARCH ON MARYLAND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCULTURE AID NOLA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE BARS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPILOT LIGHT — $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…Tides FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Brooklyn Community Fo…The Greater New Orlea…Silicon Valley Commun…Amalgamated Charitabl…Rockefeller Philanthr…The Kresge FoundationConrad N Hilton Found…California Community …Impactassetsinc
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Tides Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Kresge Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Restaurant Workers' Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Restaurant Workers' Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Restaurant Workers' Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home