· Private foundation
Rest Haven Preventorium for Children Aka Childrens Health Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of REST HAVEN PREVENTORIUM FOR CHILDREN AKA CHILDRENS HEALTH FUND’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $195k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $35,220 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION | $33,675 |
| IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - SAN DIEG | $20,000 |
| SHARP HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $15,219 |
| JACOBS CUSHMAN SD FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| HOME OF GUIDING HANDS | $13,777 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF OCEANSIDE | $12,000 |
| GIRLS RISING | $10,000 |
| UC REGENTS | $10,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH COUNTY | $10,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF VISTA | $9,724 |
| ELIZABETH HOSPICE | $8,250 |
| SBCS | $6,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS | $5,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IVIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK4× · 2021–2024 · $83k · revenue +6%
- NHNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN2× · 2022–2024 · $64k · revenue +23%
- HOHOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- SDSAN DIEGO BLOOD BANKone grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue -4%
- JCJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANKone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -12%
- JAJACOBS AND CUSHMAN SD FOOD BANKone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…
Crf, in partnership with our clients and stakeholders, designs, delivers and evaluates innovative and exemplary behavioral health and social services in a manner that is both culturally and trauma competent, providing these services with…
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Starview children & family services provides social and mental health services in california. the services provided will embody a commitment to high clinical standards and quality improvements to assist clients to achieve their maximum…
The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.
Sierra Vista Child & Family Services (SVCFS) is a non-profit community based organization providing services for children, youth, adults, and families since 1972 to over 16,000 children and families yearly. The agency provides an extensive…
Hannahs Family Center envisions a world where strong families enable children to thrive and communities to prosper. Since 1993, we have helped San Diego families navigate significant adverse changes, trauma and loss. As experts in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home of Guiding Hands Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Imperial Valley Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN ↗
- Who funds SBCS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO BLOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HOME OF GUIDING HANDS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Sharp Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE ELIZABETH HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds Emilio Nares Foundation ↗
- Who funds PALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AUTISM TREE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ASELTINE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CONNECTMED INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS ↗
- Who funds GIRLS RISING ↗
- Who funds HOME START INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Price Philanthropies Foundation · French Fund Samuel Katherine Tua · Sempra Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Leichtag Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rest Haven Preventorium for Children Aka Childrens Health Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rest Haven Preventorium for Children Aka Childrens Health Fund?
Find your warmest path to Rest Haven Preventorium for Children Aka Childrens Health Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.