· Private foundation
Ress Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $34k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHWAB CHARITABLE DAFS | $79,860 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION | $6,750 |
| MASSACHUSETTS RIVERS ALLIANCE INC | $5,000 |
| SEA TURTLE CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM | $3,500 |
| TEMPLE EMANU-EL | $1,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,800 |
| HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND | $1,000 |
| CHARLES RIVER CLEAN UP BOAT | $1,000 |
| CHEWONKI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER | $1,000 |
| BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY | $500 |
| NONPROFIT CENTER OF BERKSHIRES | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
74 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JAJEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +23%
Sea Turtle Conservancy6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +11%
NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION5× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +108%
Funded once
- SSEEone grant, 2017 · $98k
- SCSCWAB CHARITABLEone grant, 2021 · $25k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
The university of rhode island alumni association informs and engages current and future alumni as committed partners of the university, its missions and traditions.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
The rhode island foundation mobilizes generosity and motivates change that makes a difference
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Aquarium Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Charles River Clean up Boat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds Sea Turtle Conservancy ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COLLABORATIVE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Rivers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds The Miriam Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BROOKLINE CHINESE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Charles River Clean up Boat ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Champlin Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · June Rockwell Levy Foundation Incorporated · Barr Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Gertrude N & Seebert J Goldowsky Foundation · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Pearle W & Martin M Silverstein Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Weisberg Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ress Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Captain Forbes House Museum — 100% of income from government
- Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc — 18% of income from government
- National Marine Life Center Inc — 16% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Charles River Watershed Association Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Speak for the Trees Inc — 2% of income from government
- National Yiddish Book Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Sea Turtle Conservancy — 1% of income from government
- Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Rivers Alliance Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Wildlife Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.