Skip to content

· Private foundation

Resource Trust Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$95kFood & Nutrition$84kEducation$73kHousing & Shelter$63kHealth$61kArts & Culture$60kPublic Benefit$50kCrime & Legal$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLAINE COUNTY CHARITABLE FUND$8,000
THE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY$8,000
THE SPACE IDAHO$7,500
SUN VALLEY REALTORS GIVE$5,000
BLAINE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
SENIOR CONNECTION$5,000
MSCL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH$4,000
FRIENDS OF BELLEVUE PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,000
SUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
ST THOMAS PLAYHOUSE$3,000
FRIENDS OF HAILEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SENIOR CONNECTION: $10k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $10k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $5k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $5k → 7%43 NORTH INC: $5k → 7%43 NORTH INC: $5k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $5k → 7%SENIOR CONNECTION: $5k → 7%43 NORTH INC: $2k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%BALD MOUNTAIN RESCUE FUND: $5k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MT
NY
OR
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$558k · 31 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
16

Total granted

$558k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-8%

Still filing today

58%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalCivil RightsRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    Sun Valley Realtors Give Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +106%
  • BC
    BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +172%
  • BC
    BLAINE COUNTY CHARITABLE FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • SP
    SERHIY PRYTULA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HI
    HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wood River Women's Foundation

Amplify the power of women's collective giving to support the wood river valley's non-profits and create positive change in our community.

Philanthropy
2
Brazos Valley Food Bank Inc

Cultivate an environment where our community can grow, contribute and thrive together. a more resilient brazos valley where nutritious food and opportunity are attainable for all.

Food & Nutrition
3
Idaho Base Camp Inc

A nonprofit organization rooted in the wood river valley, idaho basecamp helps develop resilience, confidence, and connection in youth through adventure, exploration, and intentional play in the outdoors.

Environment
4
Project Big Wood a Nonprofit Corporation

Project big wood is organized to improve the environmental health and ecology of the big wood river basin in central idaho by protecting, enhancing, sustaining and reconnecting the big wood river, its tributaries and its watershed.

Environment
5
Flathead Food Bank Inc

The Flathead Food Bank strives to elimnate hunger in the Flathead Valley through collaborative partnerships creating effective solutions to connect and strengthen individuals, families and the community through access to healthy nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
6
Rainier Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to nourish with good food, empower with knowledge, and serve with compassion.

Unclassified
7
Idaho Foodbank Warehouse

To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.

Food & Nutrition
8
Ecosystem Sciences Foundation Inc

River and watershed restoration

Environment
9
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
10
Wood River Community Housing Trust Inc

The wood river community housing trust inc. (wrcht) is an idaho nonprofit corporation formed specifically to resolve the lack of housing in the wood river valley of blaine county, idaho. its mission is acquire or develop affordable rental…

Housing & Shelter
11
Wood River Land Trust Co

The wood river land trust's mission is to protect and sustain the treasured landscapes and life-giving waters of the wood river valley and to inspire love for this special place for generations to come.

Environment
12
Bitterroot Water Partnership

BWP leads reliable and intentional conservation initiatives that promote and provide clean, ample water for people and habitats by working with key partners and our communities

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for Lane County; the most unlike its peers is Reporters Without Borders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOM VIOL: $30,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOM VIOLVENICE INSTITUTE FOR PERFORMING ART: $27,500 · OtherVENICE INSTITUTE FOR PERFORMING ARTREHABILITATION DAR ES SALAAM: $20,000 · OtherREHABILITATION DAR ES SALAAMFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherST THOMAS PLAYHOUSE: $15,000 · OtherBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherKRONENDAL PRIMARY SCHOOL: $12,000 · OtherHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $14,000 · OtherThe Space Idaho Inc: $15,500 · Other+33 more: $159,401 · Other+33 moreBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $40,000 · Human ServicesBLAINE COUNTY S…FLOURISH FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesFLOURISH FOUNDA…43 NORTH INC: $12,000 · Human Services43 NORTH INCBald Mountain Rescue Fund: $5,000 · Human ServicesBald Mountain R…BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionBLAINE COUN…ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS …Sun Valley Realtors Give Inc: $51,000 · PhilanthropyBLAINE COUNTY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $48,000 · Public BenefitMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $28,000 · InternationalGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $4,000 · InternationalReporters Without Borders Inc: $20,000 · Civil RightsGLOBAL GRASSROOTS: $6,000 · Civil Rights
Other$340,401Human Services$89,000Food & Nutrition$67,000Philanthropy$51,000Public Benefit$48,000International$32,000Civil Rights$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSun Valley Realtors Give Inc: $51,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $48,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $40,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetReporters Without Borders Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Space Idaho Inc: $15,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget43 NORTH INC: $12,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetSUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY: $8,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL GRASSROOTS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 61 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBald Mountain Rescue Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sun Valley Realtors Give Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY CHARITABLE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds FLOURISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Reporters Without Borders Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Space Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds 43 NORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds ROCK ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GRASSROOTS ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 61 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bald Mountain Rescue Fund ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boswell Family FoundationID28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boswell Family Foundation · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Helios Foundation · Heinz Family Foundation · Koa Charitable Trust · Nicholas Martin Jr Family Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · The Bessemer Giving Fund · St Luke's Wood River Foundation Inc · The Von Der Heyden Family Foundation · Roth Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Resource Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Resource Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Resource Trust Inc?

Find your warmest path to Resource Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Resource’s filings →

More from the funding graph