· Public charity
St Luke's Wood River Foundation Inc
To inspire generosity that improves health and well-being in the community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $131k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER | $1,244,093 |
| MENS SECOND CHANCE LIVING | $50,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES | $36,000 |
| FLOURISH FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| THE HUNGER COALITION | $30,000 |
| HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $472k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +71% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSt Luke's Wood River Medical Center Ltd8× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +44%
- HAHOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOOD RIVER VALLEY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +121%
- COCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $216k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- SLSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltdone grant, 2023 · $2.3M · revenue +18%
- HGHIGHER GROUND USA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +73%
- BCBLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 61 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +71%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
The mission of st. luke community healthcare is to remain an integral component of the communities of the mission valley through the delivery of personal, compassionate, quality health care in a dignified manner that values our patients,…
To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.
To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.
Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.
To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…
We deliver a healthcare experience that consistently exceeds patients' expectations through exceptional people - our people are our foundation. we employ trusted, dedicated professionals who serve with compassion, empathy and respect.…
Our mission is to build healthier communities by providing high-quality primary care that integrates physical and behavioral health while removing barriers to wellness.
To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.
We make a positive difference in the health of the patients and communities we serve.
To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blaine County Seniors Council Inc the Senior Connection and the most unlike its peers is Blaine County Hunger Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds St Luke's Wood River Medical Center Ltd ↗
- Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOOD RIVER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC ↗
- Who funds FLOURISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
- Who funds Wood River Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 61 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Boswell Family Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Nicholas Martin Jr Family Foundation · Heinz Family Foundation · Resource Trust Inc · Thrasher Koffey Foundation · The Nalen Foundation · Nancy Eccles and Homer M Hayward Family Foundation · Elizabeth a Lynn Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St Luke's Wood River Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.