· Public charity
Resolve to Save Lives Inc
Our mission is to accelerate action against the world's deadliest health threats to save millions of lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $9,252,812 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $25,594,216 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $16,341,404 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k3 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
- $250k+8 grants · $9.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VITAL STRATEGIES INC | $2,752,007 |
| CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO FREE KIDS | $1,500,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK | $1,420,000 |
| CDC FOUNDATION | $1,060,703 |
| PATH | $845,007 |
| VITAL STRATEGIES INC | $597,462 |
| PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION - PAHO | $449,175 |
| PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION | $383,228 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $95,282 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $49,996 |
| COALITION FOR AMERICAS HEALTH | $49,980 |
| PATH | $49,972 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $18M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH · PREVENT EPIDEMICS
Stated purpose: PREVENT EPIDEMICS · CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH · PREVENT EPIDEMICS AND CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH
Stated purpose: CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH · PREVENT EPIDEMICS
Stated purpose: CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH
Stated purpose: CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH · PREVENT EPIDEMICS
Stated purpose: CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH
Stated purpose: CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VSVITAL STRATEGIES INC4× · 2021–2024 · $7.7M · revenue +21%
- CFCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS3× · 2022–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +78%
- PPATH2× · 2022–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +0%
Funded once
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated2× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +26%
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $225k · revenue +29%- CHCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INCone grant, 2022 · $188k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…
To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
The association of academic health centers (aahc) seeks to improve the nation's health care system by mobilizing and enhancing the strengths and resources of the academic health center enterprise in health professions, education, patient…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Todd County 4-H Leaders Council Mn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LAST MILE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT ASSOC OF BLACK ORG ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR AMERICAS HEALTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vital Strategies Inc · Gates Foundation · Gavi Alliance · Path · Johns Hopkins University · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Resolve to Save Lives Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Resolve to Save Lives Inc?
Find your warmest path to Resolve to Save Lives Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.