Loading…
· Public charity
RESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC
Our mission is to save as many lives as possible.
$26M
Granted FY2023
12
Grants
5
Communities
$2.8M
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2023.
International$9.9MEducation$5.1MHealth$2.7MArts & Culture$1.1MScience & Tech$225kPhilanthropy$58kOther$1.7M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
—
2022
hypertension cardiovascularepidemic preventioncovid rapidrapid responsehealth carecare workerworker epidemic
2023
prevent epidemicscardiovascular health
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k3 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
- $250k+8 grants · $9.0M
$597,462
Median grant
5
States reached
$145M
Total assets
Largest grants
- VITAL STRATEGIES INC$2,752,007
- CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO FREE KIDS$1,500,000
- THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$1,420,000
- CDC FOUNDATION$1,060,703
- PATH$845,007
- VITAL STRATEGIES INC$597,462
- PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION - PAHO$449,175
- PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION$383,228
- UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$95,282
- ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$49,996
- COALITION FOR AMERICAS HEALTH$49,980
- PATH$49,972
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 7 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
7
7
Total granted
$16M
$3.9M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+13%
+93%
Still filing today
86%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
InternationalEducationHealthScience & TechPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK2× · 2022–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +13%
PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $690k · revenue +85%
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +58%
Funded once
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated2× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +45%
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCESone grant, 2022 · $225k · revenue +15%- CHCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $188k · revenue +93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
International Aids Vaccine
Translate scientific discoveries into affordable, globally accessible public health solutions
International
2
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Health
3
International Community Health Services
Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.
Health
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Membership Benefit
5
University Health Inc
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
—
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
7
University Family Physicians Inc
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of family medicine.
—
8
The California Medical Innovations
Bringing together physical and life science researchers, clinicians, engineers/ and computational scientists to address the significant health care challenges of heart and vascular disease, obesity, and metabolic disorders through a…
Education
9
University of Maryland Physicians Pa
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
—
10
The Administrators in Medicine
Health
11
Global Health Council
Global health council is the leading membership organization supporting and connecting advocates, implementers, and stakeholders around global health priorities worldwide. the global health council, inc. (the "council"ghc") was…
International
12
Intealth
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vital Strategies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
International$9,886,771Education$5,089,860Health$2,657,480Other$1,693,635Arts & Culture$1,060,703Science & Tech$225,000Philanthropy$57,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CDC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LAST MILE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL (FHI 360) ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR AMERICAS HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Vital Strategies IncNY20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Vital Strategies Inc · Gates Foundation · Gavi Alliance · Path · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RESOLVE TO SAVE LIVES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COALITION FOR AMERICAS HEALTH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 853425179 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on COALITION FOR AMERICAS HEALTH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Resolve to Save Lives Inc?
Find your warmest path to Resolve to Save Lives Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines