Skip to content

· Public charity

Reruns R Fun Inc

Raise money from consigned used merchandise and donate to various charities.

$304k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$23kEducation$7kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$6kHealth$6k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,674, the rows itemized in this filing. The $304,492 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $297,818 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,674
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NeighborGood Community Pantry$6,674
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%St Columbkille: $13k → 6%Mercy High School: $7k → 12%St Columbkille: $11k → 6%Goodfellows: $6k → 12%NeighborGood Community Pantry: $7k → 6%DARE America: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
2
Furniture Project Omaha

Provide assistance to those in-need within our community. We want to not only provide furniture but also inspire hope to show them that their neighbors care about them.

Housing & Shelter
3
St Vincent De Paul Stores

A network of neighbors, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.

Human Services
4
Baby's Bounty

To provide essential clothing and supplies to babies born into disadvantaged families.

Human Services
5
Goodwill Industries Inc

Goodwill changes lives and strengthens communities through education, training and work. goodwill strives to increase self sufficiency of its participants through vocational evaluation, training and offering employment opportunities to…

Employment
6
Hope Pregnancy Clinic

To empower women unprepared for pregnancy to make healthy, life affirming decisions, and to introduce them to jesus christ.

Health
7
BABY2BABY

Baby2baby provides children in need across the country with diapers, formula, clothing and all the basic necessities that every child deserves.

Unclassified
8
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
9
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
10
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
11
Goodwill Industries of the Pioneer Valley Inc

See schedule o.the mission of goodwill industries of the pioneer valley (goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. on december 22, 2017 the organization entered…

—
12
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Youth of America Charity Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Columbkille: $23,405 · OtherSt ColumbkilleMERCY HIGH SCHOOL: $7,453 · OtherMERCY HIGH SCHOOLWORLD HERALD GOODFELLOWS CHARITIES: $6,000 · OtherWORLD HERALD GOODFELLOWS CHARITIESNeighborGood Community Pantry: $6,674 · Food & NutritionNeighborGood Co…DARE AMERICA: $5,500 · HealthDARE AMERICA
Other$36,858Food & Nutrition$6,674Health$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNeighborGood Community Pantry: $6,674 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDARE AMERICA: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NeighborGood Community Pantry ↗
  • Who funds DARE AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Midlands Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · William and Ruth Scott Family Foundation · Dixon Family Foundation · Seline Family Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reruns R Fun Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reruns R Fun Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $243k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reruns R Fun’s filings →

    More from the funding graph