Loading…
· Public charity
Reruns R Fun Inc
Raise money from consigned used merchandise and donate to various charities.
$304k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants
1
Communities
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of Reruns R Fun Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
health
2019
healthyouthitems
2020
crisisyouthitems
2021
districtyouthitems
2022
furniturededicatedclothingitemspersonalyouth
2023
clean clothingfurniturededicatedyouthomahapersonalhousehold items
2024
greatesthealthpromotingdedicateditemsomaha
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$6,674
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
- NeighborGood Community Pantry$6,674
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 8%. 39% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Human Choice of Iowa
Provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education.
Human Services
2
Nebraska Diaper Bank
Nebraska diaper bank provides diapers through collaborative partnerships to change lives and empower families in need. with a vision of a heartland without diaper need where families thrive and all babies are happy, healthy and safe.
Food & Nutrition
3
Furniture Project Omaha
Provide assistance to those in-need within our community. We want to not only provide furniture but also inspire hope to show them that their neighbors care about them.
Housing & Shelter
4
Door of Hope Pregnancy Care Center
To provide counseling and support for people involved in crisis pregnancies.
Health
5
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines
To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness
—
6
New Hope Services Inc
Provide services in response to individual need.
Human Services
7
Baby's Bounty
To provide essential clothing and supplies to babies born into disadvantaged families.
Human Services
8
Life Choice Center
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
Health
9
Dakota Hope Clinic
Dakota hope is part of a world-wide movement to offer love and support to women and men who face an unintended or unwelcomed pregnancy, or have other sexual health concerns. the clinic is a life-affirming organization; therefore, they do…
Human Services
10
One Omaha
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
Community Improvement
11
Hands of Hope for Life Inc
Pregnancy parenting post abortion and post miscarriage education.provide diapers clothing and furniture for babies.provide maternity clothing for moms.
Health
12
Hope Pregnancy Clinic
Pregnancy medical clinic providing free pregnancy related services to women.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Harmony and the most unlike its peers is Oneworld Community Health Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
10%
424/4,280
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$36,858Food & Nutrition$6,674Health$5,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Lozier FoundationNE24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider · United Way of the Midlands · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · William and Ruth Scott Family Foundation · Dixon Family Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Midlands Community Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Reruns R Fun Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NeighborGood Community Pantry.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 813241050 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NeighborGood Community Pantry, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Reruns R Fun Inc?
Find your warmest path to Reruns R Fun Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines