Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Reruns R Fun Inc

Raise money from consigned used merchandise and donate to various charities.

$304k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Religion$23kEducation$7kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$6kHealth$6k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $6,674 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $304,492 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $297,818 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,674
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NeighborGood Community Pantry$6,674
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 39% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%St Columbkille: $13k → 6%Mercy High School: $7k → 12%St Columbkille: $11k → 6%Goodfellows: $6k → 12%NeighborGood Community Pantry: $7k → 6%DARE America: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
2
Furniture Project Omaha

Provide assistance to those in-need within our community. We want to not only provide furniture but also inspire hope to show them that their neighbors care about them.

Housing & Shelter
3
St Vincent De Paul Stores

A network of neighbors, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.

Human Services
4
Baby's Bounty

To provide essential clothing and supplies to babies born into disadvantaged families.

Human Services
5
Goodwill Industries Inc

Goodwill changes lives and strengthens communities through education, training and work. goodwill strives to increase self sufficiency of its participants through vocational evaluation, training and offering employment opportunities to…

Employment
6
Hope Pregnancy Clinic

To empower women unprepared for pregnancy to make healthy, life affirming decisions, and to introduce them to jesus christ.

Health
7
BABY2BABY

Baby2baby provides children in need across the country with diapers, formula, clothing and all the basic necessities that every child deserves.

Unclassified
8
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

9
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

10
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
11
Goodwill Industries of the Pioneer Valley Inc

See schedule o.the mission of goodwill industries of the pioneer valley (goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. on december 22, 2017 the organization entered…

12
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Youth of America Charity Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr17%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%0%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr17%38%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
11%
491/4,280

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Columbkille — $23,405 · OtherSt ColumbkilleMERCY HIGH SCHOOL — $7,453 · OtherMERCY HIGH SCHOOLWORLD HERALD GOODFELLOWS CHARITIES — $6,000 · OtherWORLD HERALD GOODFELLOWS CHARITIESNeighborGood Community Pantry — $6,674 · Food & NutritionNeighborGood Co…DARE AMERICA — $5,500 · HealthDARE AMERICA
Other$36,858Food & Nutrition$6,674Health$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNeighborGood Community Pantry — $6,674 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDARE AMERICA — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NeighborGood Community Pantry
  • Who funds DARE AMERICA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Midlands Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · William and Ruth Scott Family Foundation · Dixon Family Foundation · Seline Family Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Reruns R Fun Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $243k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph