Skip to content

· Public charity

Renewing the Countryside

RENEWING THE COUNTRYSIDE strengthens rural areas by championing and supporting rural communities, farmers, artists, entrepreneurs, educators, activists and other people who are RENEWING THE COUNTRYSIDE through sustainable and innovative initiatives, businesses, and projects.

$566k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$110kCommunity Improvement$34kHuman Services$33kEnvironment$29kEducation$27k
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $209,013, the rows itemized in this filing. The $565,855 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $356,842 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOLWELL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION$14,400
THE FOOD GROUP$11,000
LYNDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION$10,000
GREAT RIVER SCHOOL$10,000
HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION$10,000
NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVT INST$10,000
ST PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
SOMALI AMERICAN FARMERS ASSN$9,895
BF 50 CENTRAL AREA NEIGH DEVT ORG$9,774
MN FARMERS MARKET ASSN$9,700
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN OF THE NORTH$8,250
CAMPHOR MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,000
HOLISTIC HEALTH FARMS$8,000
R ROOTS GARDEN$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,170
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN OF THE NORTH: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Farmers Market Association

We envision a community of vibrant, profitable, and professionally managed farmers markets that provide all Minnesotans access to local farm fresh foods, allow local producers to thrive and grow, and ensure that these opportunities are…

Community Improvement
2
Frogtown Garden

Frogtown Farm is an urban farm with a mission to enrich the world by cultivating soil and community in Frogtown. The farm is built upon values of justice for people and the planet, connection within and across communities, resilience with…

Environment
3
Minneapolis Climate Action

Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…

Environment
4
The Good Acre

We connect and strengthen farmers, food makers, and communities through good food. the good acre is the largest nonprofit food hub in minnesota. we play a critical role in creating market access for farmers in our region. for 2023, with…

Food & Nutrition
5
Northside Residents Redevelopment Council Inc

NRRC informs, engages and facilitates the residents of the Near North and Willard Hay neighborhoods in Minneapolis to be primary agents for improving the social, economic, environmental and livability conditions in their community.

Community Improvement
6
Central Minnesota Vegetable Growers Assn

The CMVGA is dedicated to the success of its farmers markets, the future of small farms and agriculture, and most importantly, providing quality to customers. We are proud to offer the largest selection of products of any farmers market in…

—
7
Sustainable Farming Association of Minnesota

Support the development and enhancement of sustainable farming systems through farmer-to-farmer networking, innovation, demonstration, and education.

Food & Nutrition
8
Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors Foundation Inc
—
9
Audubon Neighborhood Association

The Audubon Neighborhood Association ANA works to strengthen the quality of life and community resiliency for all in the Audubon Neighborhood by facilitating community engagement and relationships and helping all members of the…

Environment
10
Youth Farm and Market Project

Youth Farm's mission is simple - we farm to grow. We farm to grow food, community, and, most importantly, young leaders. Youth learn to plant, grow, cook, and responsibly distribute local produce while developing real world leadership…

—
11
North Country Food Alliance

The mission of North Country Food Alliance is to strengthen food sovereignty in the Twin Cities Metro Area. We do this through two main program areas: foodshare and gardening. Our foodshare program rescues overstock food that would…

Food & Nutrition
12
Environmental Initiative

Catalyze collaboration across perspectives, power, and systems for social equity and environmental health.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lyndale Neighborhood Association; the most unlike its peers is Folwell Neighborhood Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVT INST: $10,000 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVT INSTSAINT PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherSAINT PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLSSOMALI AMERICAN FARMERS ASSN: $9,895 · OtherSOMALI AMERICAN FARMERS ASSNBF 50 CENTRAL AREA NEIGH DEVT ORG: $9,774 · OtherBF 50 CENTRAL AREA NEIGH DEVT ORGMN FARMERS MARKET ASSN: $9,700 · OtherMN FARMERS MARKET ASSNCAMPHOR MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherHOLISTIC HEALTH FARMS: $8,000 · OtherR ROOTS GARDEN: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,170 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,025 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,915 · OtherHAMLINE UNIV OF MN: $6,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,584 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · Other+1 more: $5,200 · OtherFolwell Neighborhood Association: $14,400 · Community ImprovementFolwell Neighbor…Hamline Midway Coalition: $10,000 · Community ImprovementHamline Midway C…Lyndale Neighborhood Association: $10,000 · Community ImprovementLyndale Neighbor…Great River School Charter School No 4105-07: $10,000 · EducationWE WIN INSTITUTE INC: $7,150 · EducationFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $11,000 · Food & NutritionYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $8,250 · Human Services
Other$163,213Community Improvement$34,400Education$17,150Food & Nutrition$11,000Human Services$8,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFolwell Neighborhood Association: $14,400 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHamline Midway Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetLyndale Neighborhood Association: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGreat River School Charter School No 4105-07: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE WIN INSTITUTE INC: $7,150 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Folwell Neighborhood Association ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
  • Who funds Hamline Midway Coalition ↗
  • Who funds Lyndale Neighborhood Association ↗
  • Who funds Great River School Charter School No 4105-07 ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
  • Who funds WE WIN INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The McKnight FoundationMN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The McKnight Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Renewing the Countryside funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Renewing the Countryside. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Renewing the Countryside?

    Find your warmest path to Renewing the Countryside through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Renewing the Countryside’s filings →

    More from the funding graph