Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$3.7MHuman Services$1.9MHealth$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.1MHousing & Shelter$875kArts & Culture$430kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,100,000
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$200,000
LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC$175,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION$150,000
THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$125,000
METROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$100,000
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$100,000
GRAHAM WINDHAM$75,000
ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$50,000
PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS CORPORATION$50,000
NORTH MECKLENBURG CHILD DEVELOPMENT$25,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 59% of grant dollars ($9.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 41% that went abroad ($6.4M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $175k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $125k → 20%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $150k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $150k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $150k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $75k → 20%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $125k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $19k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US — 41% of all-years giving ($6.4M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$6.4M · 6 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 41% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 15 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$13M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+127%

Still filing today

87%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +84%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $875k · revenue +56%
  • FH
    FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $740k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +69%
  • TK
    TECH KIDS UNLIMITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +127%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

3
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
4
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
5
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
6
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

7
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
8
The Studio Museum in Harlem

The studio museum in harlem is a contemporary art museum that focuses on the work of artists of african descent - as well as work that has been inspired and influenced by african culture - past and present; through its exhibitions,…

Arts & Culture
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $6,445,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBATTERY DANCE CORPORATIN DBA BATTERY D — $250,000 · Other+1 more — $100,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,000,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U…THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $350,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITYTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 · EducationNORTH MECKLENBURG CHILD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $165,000 · EducationLEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATIVE FUND INC — $625,000 · Human ServicesLEVITICUS 25…GRAHAM WINDHAM — $600,000 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDH…HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $543,866 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET…FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $740,000 · HealthMETROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $445,000 · HealthCENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC — $1,075,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $875,000 · Community ImprovementMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $150,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT HEALTHY MINDS — $150,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC — $25,000 · Youth Development
Other$6,795,000Education$3,685,000Human Services$1,768,866Health$1,185,000Crime & Legal$1,075,000Community Improvement$875,000Arts & Culture$330,000Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC — $1,075,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $875,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $740,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATIVE FUND INC — $625,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM — $600,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $543,866 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMETROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $445,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $350,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBATTERY DANCE CORPORATIN DBA BATTERY D — $250,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH MECKLENBURG CHILD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $165,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS — $150,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009?

    Find your warmest path to Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph