Skip to content
Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009 at a glance

· Private foundation

Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.7MHuman Services$1.9MHealth$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.1MHousing & Shelter$875kArts & Culture$430kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,100,000
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$200,000
LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC$175,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION$150,000
THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$125,000
METROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$100,000
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$100,000
GRAHAM WINDHAM$75,000
ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$50,000
PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS CORPORATION$50,000
NORTH MECKLENBURG CHILD DEVELOPMENT$25,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 59% of grant dollars ($9.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 41% that went abroad ($6.4M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $175k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $125k → 20%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $150k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $150k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%LEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATE FUND INC: $150k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $100k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $75k → 20%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $125k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $19k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 41% of all-years giving ($6.4M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$6.4M · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 41% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 15 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$13M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+127%

Still filing today

87%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +84%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $875k · revenue +56%
  • FH
    FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $740k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +69%
  • TK
    TECH KIDS UNLIMITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +127%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
3
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
4
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
5
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
6
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
7
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
8
The Studio Museum in Harlem

The studio museum in harlem is a contemporary art museum that focuses on the work of artists of african descent - as well as work that has been inspired and influenced by african culture - past and present; through its exhibitions,…

Arts & Culture
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $6,445,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBATTERY DANCE CORPORATIN DBA BATTERY D: $250,000 · Other+1 more: $100,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,000,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U…THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITYTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · EducationNORTH MECKLENBURG CHILD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $165,000 · EducationLEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATIVE FUND INC: $625,000 · Human ServicesLEVITICUS 25…GRAHAM WINDHAM: $600,000 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDH…HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $543,866 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET…FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $740,000 · HealthMETROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $445,000 · HealthCENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC: $1,075,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $875,000 · Community ImprovementMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT HEALTHY MINDS: $150,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC: $25,000 · Youth Development
Other$6,795,000Education$3,685,000Human Services$1,768,866Health$1,185,000Crime & Legal$1,075,000Community Improvement$875,000Arts & Culture$330,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC: $1,075,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $875,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $740,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLEVITICUS 2523 ALTERNATIVE FUND INC: $625,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $600,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $543,866 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMETROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $445,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $350,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBATTERY DANCE CORPORATIN DBA BATTERY D: $250,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH MECKLENBURG CHILD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $165,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS: $150,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009?

    Find your warmest path to Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Renate Hans & Maria Hofmann Tr Xxxxx9009’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home