Skip to content
Reimer Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Reimer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$60kInternational$56kPhilanthropy$28kYouth Development$24kAnimals$22kHousing & Shelter$13kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$833k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAF America$10,000
Families Together Inc$10,000
Boys Grow Corp$5,000
Blue Spruce Habitat For Humanity$5,000
Jeffco Action Center Inc$5,000
Lakeview Village Foundation$4,000
Blood Cancer United$4,000
National Indigenous Womens Resource Ctr$2,500
Tanka Fund$2,500
St Judes Childrens Research Hospital$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%National Indigenous Womens Resource Ctr: $5k → 18%National Indigenous Womens Resource Ctr: $3k → 18%National Indigenous Womens Resource Ctr: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
SD
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 11 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +83% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$216k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+83%

Still filing today

91%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FAMILIES TOGETHER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $33k · revenue +154%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +20%
  • BG
    BOYS GROW CORP
    5× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • NA
    Native American Rights Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • TL
    The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • MU
    Mind Up-The Goldie Hawn Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

—
4
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
5
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
6
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
7
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
8
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
9
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the university and communities that have touched the lives of ku alumni and friends, the mission of the ku endowment charitable gift fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cultivate Kansas City Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $33,800 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AM…LAKEVIEW VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $23,700 · PhilanthropyLAKEVIEW VILLAGE FOUNDATIONGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $8,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Communi…Heartland Chamber Music LTD: $3,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILIES TOGETHER INC: $33,000 · HealthFAMILIES TOGETHER INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $24,720 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARC…+2 more: $800 · HealthBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,920 · OtherBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT …JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $9,650 · OtherJEFFCO ACTION CENTER…Heartland Chamber Music: $5,800 · OtherHeartland Chamber Mu…Native American Rights Foundation: $5,000 · OtherNative American Righ…The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: $4,000 · OtherThe Leukemia & Lymph…Mind Up-The Goldie Hawn Foundation: $4,000 · OtherMind Up-The Goldie H…HEADQUARTERS KANSAS INC: $2,500 · OtherCULTIVATE KANSAS CITY INC: $2,600 · Other+3 more: $1,600 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $32,150 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…BOYS GROW CORP: $29,450 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS GROW C…Tanka Fund: $24,840 · AnimalsTanka FundNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,750 · Human Services
Philanthropy$68,500Health$65,320Other$52,070International$32,150Youth Development$29,450Animals$24,840Human Services$8,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $33,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES TOGETHER INC: $33,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $32,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS GROW CORP: $29,450 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTanka Fund: $24,840 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $24,720 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEVIEW VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $23,700 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,920 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $9,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHeartland Chamber Music LTD: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCULTIVATE KANSAS CITY INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEADQUARTERS KANSAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Oppenstein Brothers F…United Way of Greater…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reimer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reimer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reimer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home