Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reilly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MRecreation & Sports$578kHuman Services$270kReligion$241kHealth$234kCrime & Legal$132kScience & Tech$118kArts & Culture$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$940k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$31,702
Individual grant recipient$25,000
BLAIR ACADEMY$7,500
THE HOCKADAY SCHOOL$5,000
WHITEFISH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$2,500
TEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS FOUNDATION$2,500
LA LA LAND FOUNDATION$2,500
CATCH UP & READ$2,500
CENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH$2,500
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$2,500
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$2,500
COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$1,500
SLAUGHTER FAMILY ARTS AWARDS$1,200
DUKE UNIVERSITY$1,000
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%GNU FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%DAVID'S LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%SHARING HANDS: $3k → 13%JOY TO THE WORLD FOUNDATION: $150k → 9%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $250 → 11%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 → 14%LENA POPE HOME INC: $65k → 11%LENA POPE HOME: $21k → 11%LENA POPE HOME: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
KY
WV
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 50 repeat orgs$409k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
83

Total granted

$3.4M
$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+5%

Still filing today

46%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $785k · revenue +60%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $236k · revenue +36%
  • LP
    LENA POPE HOME INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $97k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CB
    COMFORT BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FW
    FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
  • TP
    TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
3
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Worth Country Day School Inc; the most unlike its peers is A P Ranch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/68
Grantees still filing
44/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $420,343 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $275,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $115,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERCOOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $110,600 · OtherCOOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONHILL SCHOOL: $107,030 · OtherHILL SCHOOLCOMFORT BAPTIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherCOMFORT BAPTIST CHURCHMISSION ARLINGTON INC: $86,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH: $65,000 · Other+100 more: $580,230 · Other+100 moreTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $784,500 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYFORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $235,996 · EducationFORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $116,538 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard Colle…BLAIR ACADEMY: $58,000 · Education+18 more: $206,675 · Education+18 moreTEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $577,500 · PhilanthropyTEAMMATES FOR KI…+5 more: $14,500 · PhilanthropyJoy To The World Foundation: $150,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INC: $97,200 · Human Services+6 more: $5,100 · Human ServicesBROWN UNIVERSITY: $24,233 · Community ImprovementCook Children's Medical Center: $12,500 · HealthAll Saints Health Foundation: $1,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthARLINGTON PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Health+3 more: $1,000 · HealthTEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS' FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureMaine Maritime Museum: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,859,203Education$1,401,709Philanthropy$592,000Human Services$252,300Community Improvement$24,233Health$16,500Arts & Culture$12,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $784,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $577,500 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetFORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $235,996 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJoy To The World Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $116,538 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $97,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY: $58,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $24,233 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCATCH UP & READ INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEFISH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS' FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDR R W GOINES STEM ACADEMY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWilliams College: $6,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA P RANCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWORLD CRANIOFACIAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAND IN HAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetR O D MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHARING HANDS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF FORT WORTH & TARRANT COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAll Saints Health Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY VALLEY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Maritime Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Joy To The World Foundation ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
  • Who funds CATCH UP & READ INC ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX30.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Roach Foundation Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Once Upon a Time Foundation · Robert D and Catherine R Alexander Foundation · Carol J and R Denny Alexander Foundation · McCallum Family Foundation · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · The Morris Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reilly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reilly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Cambridge School Volunteers Inc: 14% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • Blair Academy: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reilly Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Reilly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reilly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph