Skip to content
Reiff Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Reiff Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.1MInternational$330kHealth$75kPhilanthropy$49kYouth Development$28kHuman Services$27kCrime & Legal$17kEducation$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KLOVE$15,000
United Reformed Church$10,000
World Outreach$10,000
Draw Nigh Ministries$4,200
OMF International Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Salem Christian Homes: $10k → 14%Salem Christian Homes: $500 → 14%Salem Christian Homes: $200 → 14%Salem Christian Homes: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ID
IL
MI
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 43 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
35

Total granted

$1.4M
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+37%

Still filing today

23%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    INDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $60k · revenue +50%
  • JM
    JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES
    4× · 2019–2023 · $54k · revenue +67%
  • JN
    JOSHUA NATIONS INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2018–2023 · $32k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • D2
    Dare 2 Share Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +1%
  • FC
    FAITH CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $51k
  • SC
    STROH CHURCH OF CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
2
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
5
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
6
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
7
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
8
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
9
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
10
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
11
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
12
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sat-7 North America; the most unlike its peers is The Fischer-Ritchey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMMANUEL AFRICA INTERNATIONAL: $141,900 · OtherEMMANUEL AFRICA INTERNATIONALDRAW NIGH MINISTRIES: $119,800 · OtherDRAW NIGH MINISTRIESPrayer for Prisoners Inte: $116,000 · OtherPrayer for Prisoners InteGlobal Recordings Network: $108,500 · OtherGlobal Recordings NetworkDare 2 Share Ministries: $70,000 · OtherWORLD CHALLENGE INC: $64,050 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $59,600 · OtherMARANATHA CHAPEL: $59,400 · OtherFAITH CHURCH: $51,000 · OtherWORLD OUTREACH: $50,300 · OtherSTROH CHURCH OF CHRIST INC: $50,000 · OtherGrateful Patient Foundation: $50,000 · Other+46 more: $449,990 · Other+46 moreINDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC: $60,000 · ReligionINDOPARTNERS…JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $54,200 · ReligionJESUSONLINE …JOSHUA NATIONS INTERNATIONAL: $31,500 · ReligionJOSHUA NATIO…GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · ReligionGLOBAL SERVE…LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $15,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN BIB…SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 · ReligionIGNITING PRAYER ACTION: $10,000 · Religion+3 more: $674 · ReligionINDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $110,500 · InternationalINDIA NAT…HARVESTING IN SPANISH: $22,000 · InternationalHARVESTIN…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATI…+3 more: $2,555 · InternationalYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO: $24,800 · HealthELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $12,800 · EducationSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $10,800 · Human ServicesTHE FISCHER-RITCHEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyEMPOWER ME UP: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,390,540Religion$196,374International$145,055Health$24,800Education$12,800Human Services$10,800Philanthropy$10,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $110,500 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetDare 2 Share Ministries: $70,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetINDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $54,200 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetWORLD OUTREACH: $50,300 over 7y, 12% of budgetJOSHUA NATIONS INTERNATIONAL: $31,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMEL BERG MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 2y, 85% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO: $24,800 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetHARVESTING IN SPANISH: $22,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $12,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $10,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FISCHER-RITCHEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIGNITING PRAYER ACTION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHAYOVEL INC: $1,305 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJoint Development Associates International: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Life International Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSIONS FRONTIER INC: $524 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTurning Point for God: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Dare 2 Share Ministries ↗
  • Who funds INDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA NATIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MEL BERG MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTING IN SPANISH ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SALEM CHRISTIAN HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…The Bolick FoundationServant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…The US Charitable Gif…The Signatry Charitab…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Renaissance Charitabl…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …
Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Bolick Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reiff Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reiff Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reiff Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home