Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$310k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.2MInternational$1.2MScience & Tech$75kEducation$70kCivil Rights$60kHealth$48kYouth Development$17kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $216k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$60,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$56,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$17,500
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$14,600
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$10,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,000
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$10,000
STARSTRUCK ACADEMY$5,500
THE HONEY FOUNDATION$2,000
FRENCHMAN'S CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC$2,000
JAFCO$1,800
SAVE A CHILDS HEART$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$1.3M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-3%

Still filing today

73%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    6× · 2018–2025 · $98k · revenue +41%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +112%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +9%
  • SA
    SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
3
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

—
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
8
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
9
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
10
American Friends of the Rambam Medical Center

To promote and support the rambam health care campus-the premier medical center in northern israel.

International
11
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
12
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $1,597,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $560,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC+3 more: $42,023 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION …JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $147,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH …FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $98,036 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $75,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL …+3 more: $30,040 · InternationalKEHILAT ROMEMU: $119,850 · OtherSTARSTRUCK ACADEMY: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $6,025 · OtherPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $69,600 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,000 · Civil RightsMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $5,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 · HealthCOOKIES FOR KIDS CANCER A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $500 · Health+2 more: $50 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,199,023International$1,250,076Other$152,375Education$70,100Civil Rights$60,000Health$7,550Human Services$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $1,597,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $560,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $147,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $98,036 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $69,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATESTONE INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOKIES FOR KIDS CANCER A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $75 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABANDONED CHILDRENS FUND: $40 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare Foundation: $23 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reh Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reh Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reh Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Reh Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph