Skip to content
Regions Hospital Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Regions Hospital Foundation

The mission of REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION (the foundation) is to advocate and develop awareness, build community partnerships, and raise charitable contributions for patient care, research and health professional education.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$35MEducation$31kRecreation & Sports$25kHuman Services$15k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $3,012,839, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,103,167 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $90,328 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.9M
$337,463
Median grant
1
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONS HOSPITAL$1,423,983
HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE$1,174,917
GROUP HEALTH INC$337,463
LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$61,476
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CYCLEHEALTH: $10k → 11%CYCLEHEALTH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35M · 7 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$35M
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+17%

Still filing today

86%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    REGIONS HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +43%
  • HI
    HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +26%
  • GH
    GROUP HEALTH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $618k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • PN
    PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGE FACULTY
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue -22%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAULgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ramsey Integrated Health Services

Ramsey integrated health services' mission is to provide the best home care experience that meets the needs of our patients.

—
2
Regions Hospital Foundation

The mission of regions hospital foundation (the foundation) is to advocate and develop awareness, build community partnerships, and raise charitable contributions for patient care, research and health professional education.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Park Nicollet Group Return

To improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

—
5
Park Nicollet Health Services

Our mission is to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

Health
6
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
7
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Improve patient care and the health of our community through research and education.

Health
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
9
University of Minnesota Health Clinics and Surgery Center Inc

University of minnesota health clinics & surgery center, inc. (csc) (the organization) is the result of a joint-venture agreement between its members, using the power of an integrated academic health system. the organization is comprised…

Health
10
Healthpartners Rc

To improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

Health
11
Hutchinson Health

Advancing health with the community of hutchinson, minnesota and the surrounding area. providing a caring, personal experience for each patient and lead in promoting health and wellness in the community.

Health
12
North Central University

North central university is a christian university with a commitment to academic excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeview Memorial Hospital Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGIONS HOSPITAL: $18,522,951 · HealthREGIONS HOSPITALHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE: $15,263,432 · HealthHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE+3 more: $839,154 · HealthPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES: $37,721 · OtherPARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES: $25,489 · OtherCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $7,500 · OtherONE HEARTLAND: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGE FACULTY: $18,790 · PhilanthropyYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $15,000 · Human ServicesMaryville University - St Louis: $5,000 · Education
Health$34,625,537Other$70,710Recreation & Sports$25,000Philanthropy$18,790Human Services$15,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGIONS HOSPITAL: $18,522,951 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE: $15,263,432 over 8y, 8.5% of budgetGROUP HEALTH INC: $617,688 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $216,466 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONE HEARTLAND: $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGE FACULTY: $18,790 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park Nicollet Foundat…College of St Scholas…Hennepin Healthcare S…
Park Nicollet FoundationMN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park Nicollet Foundation · College of St Scholastica Inc · Hennepin Healthcare System Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Regions Hospital Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Regions Hospital Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Regions Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home