Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reeth Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Community Improvement$198kArts & Culture$36kHuman Services$22kEmployment$20kPhilanthropy$17kHealth$16kHousing & Shelter$15kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUST BEE$7,000
THE CRAIG SCHOOL$5,102
THE LENS FOUNDATION$5,068
THE LENS FOUNDATION SULLIVANS ISLAND$2,575
Individual grant recipient$2,500
HOPE TO HOME$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SHARED CITY$1,590
GIGIS PLAYHOUSE$1,500
COVENANT HOUSE$1,060
EMPOWERLIT$1,040
KAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$550
THE EXCHANGE CLUB OF ISLE$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $550 → 11%COVENANT HOUSE OF NEW JERSEY: $6k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE OF NEW JERSEY: $2k → 16%Covenant House of New Jersey: $1k → 16%HOPE TO HOME FURTNITURE RESOURCE: $5k → 12%HOPE TO HOME FURNITURE RESOURCE: $1k → 12%PEDALS 4 PEANUTS: $10k → 12%Peninsula Biblical Counseling Ministries: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 8 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
25

Total granted

$250k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+25%

Still filing today

88%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LENS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $183k · revenue +141% · 35% of their budget
  • MT
    Meet The Needs Charleston
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • CP
    CHARLESTON PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $24k · revenue -75%
  • HA
    HUB AT CENTERPOINT
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • TL
    THE LENS FOUNDATION TO BENEFICIARIES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
2
Charlotte Center City Partners

Charlotte center city partners (cccp) boldly envisions and activates strategies and actions that will assure charlotte center city is a welcoming and equitable, economically vibrant, culturally rich and beloved place for all.

—
3
Carolina Collaborative Prep

Carolina collaborative prep (ccp) is a non-profit academic center that serves students in grades 3-12 with learning differences, empowering them to thrive in school and in life.

Education
4
Charleston Legal Access

To expand access to legal representation and rights in South Carolina.

Crime & Legal
5
Charleston Moves

Charleston Moves is a nonprofit organization that advocates for bicycle, pedestrian and public transit infrastructure and policies across Charleston County. We envision a connected community where safe transportation choice enhances access…

Recreation & Sports
6
C4 Ministries of Laurens County

General assistance to help families experiencing homelessness and low-income families achieve sustaiinable independence through a community-based response.

Human Services
7
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
8
TURN90

Turn90 is a nonprofit employment social enterprise that combines job training, supportive services, and peer mentorship to create a pathway to success after prison.

Crime & Legal
9
The Charleston Promise Neighborhood

To provide and facilitate comprehensive programs and services that support children, strengthen families, and mobilize residents to action.

Education
10
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
11
Charlotte City Market

The market at 7th street is a mission-based nonprofit that combines culinary and retail innovation, economic opportunity, and a sense of belonging. the market: 1) incubates new food and retail businesses, 2) supports economic mobility…

Health
12
Charlotte Is Creative

Charlotte Is Creative develops programs and initiatives designed to break the Charlotte mold and remake it with creativity into a city that draws people in, excites them, and inspires them to invest their financial, social and creative…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meeting Street Schools; the most unlike its peers is Pedals 4 Peanuts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LENS FOUNDATION: $182,756 · Community ImprovementTHE LENS FOUNDATIONHUB AT CENTERPOINT: $15,000 · Community ImprovementHUB AT CENTERPOINT+1 more: $6,590 · Community ImprovementCHARLESTON PLAYHOUSE: $23,560 · OtherCHARLESTON PLAYHOUSETHE LENS FOUNDATION TO BENEFICIARIES: $10,449 · OtherTHE LENS FOUNDATION TO …Individual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…GALLIARD CENTER: $5,000 · OtherGALLIARD CENTERKINGS CROSS CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherKINGS CROSS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…Individual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+17 more: $20,510 · Other+17 morePedals 4 Peanuts: $10,000 · Human ServicesPedals 4 …COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC: $9,135 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …Hope To Home Furniture Resource: $6,000 · Human ServicesHope To H…PENINSULA BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTE: $5,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA…COVENANT HOUSE: $1,060 · Human Services+1 more: $550 · Human ServicesPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $14,850 · PhilanthropyIsle of Palms Community Corporation: $6,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $200 · PhilanthropyMeet The Needs Charleston: $20,000 · Food & NutritionJUST BEE: $7,000 · EducationTHE CRAIG SCHOOL: $6,102 · EducationMEETING STREET SCHOOLS: $1,000 · EducationTHE NAVIGATION CENTER FKA MILITARY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF SC INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$204,346Other$79,519Human Services$31,745Philanthropy$21,050Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$14,102Public Benefit$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LENS FOUNDATION: $182,756 over 5y, 35% of budgetCHARLESTON PLAYHOUSE: $23,560 over 1y, 23% of budgetMeet The Needs Charleston: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHUB AT CENTERPOINT: $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $14,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAVIGATION CENTER FKA MILITARY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF SC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC: $9,135 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUST BEE: $7,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSHARED CITY: $6,590 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetTHE CRAIG SCHOOL: $6,102 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHope To Home Furniture Resource: $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTE: $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetLEEWAY SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEETING STREET SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Meet The Needs Charleston ↗
  • Who funds HUB AT CENTERPOINT ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NAVIGATION CENTER FKA MILITARY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS OF SC INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUST BEE ↗
  • Who funds SHARED CITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CRAIG SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Hope To Home Furniture Resource ↗
  • Who funds Isle of Palms Community Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTE ↗
  • Who funds LEEWAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MEETING STREET SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds KAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reeth Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reeth Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc: 34% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reeth Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph