How much did REESE FOUNDATION 47F055017 grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of REESE FOUNDATION 47F055017’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

hope

2025

hope

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k15 grants · $80k
$10k–50k7 grants · $120k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$7,500

Median grant

States reached

$4.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$50,000
NORTH STAR INITIATIVE$35,000
WATER STREET MINISTRIES$20,000
CHRIST'S HOME FOR CHILDREN$15,000
LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE$15,000
SALVATION ARMY OF LANCASTER$15,000
CENTER FOR PARENTYOUTH$10,000
BIBLE2SCHOOL$10,000
VICKERY TRADING COMPANY$7,500
HOPE INSPIRE LOVE INC$7,500
ACADEMY 4$7,500
GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES$7,500
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP BIBLE2SCHOOL$6,500
LANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$6,000
BIBLE VISUALS INTERNATIONAL INC$5,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $248k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 23 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%

+522%

Still filing today

70%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesReligionEducationCrime & LegalEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NS
NORTH STAR INITIATIVE
6× · 2020–2025 · $213k · revenue +463%
LB
LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE
6× · 2020–2025 · $101k · revenue +16%
WS
WATER STREET MINISTRIES
3× · 2023–2025 · $57k · revenue +93%

Funded once

WS
WATER STREET RESCUE MISSION
one grant, 2022 · $20k
MN
MOVIEGUIDE-GOOD NEWS COMMUNICATIONS
one grant, 2023 · $20k
M
MOVIEGUIDE
one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bridge of Hope Ministries

As a faith-based organization, we believe our mission is to share God's love for all unhoused or housing insecure individuals regardless of age, gender, race, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or faith tradition.

Religion

Audio Scripture Ministries

Audio scripture ministries helps connect people to god's word in their own heart language.

—

Christianity Today International

Equipping Christians to renew their minds, serve the church, and create culture to the glory of God

Religion

Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible exists to ignite passion for god's word.

Religion

Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—

International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion

Wesley Biblical Seminary

Wesley biblical seminary is a multi-denominational school of theology that provides undergraduate, graduate and doctorate level education for individuals who are preparing for christian service.

Education

Peacemaker Ministries

To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.

International

Biblical Counseling and Training

To teach individuals how to apply the wisdom and depth of the bible's grace-centered message to the problems of daily living; and through various means, work to restore chirst to counseling and christ-centered counseling to the church.

—

His Way At Work

Provide businesses with the guidance and support to gradually transform them into christ centered organizations that operate on virtue based principles and demonstrate christian caring.

Religion

Harvest House Ministries

To teach the true meaning of repentance and remission of sin as stated in luke 24:47 in an easy to understand duplicable way that produces real lifelong profitable results.

Community Improvement

PrayerMentor

Empowering Christian leaders to pray for the harvest

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vickery Trading Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/22

the rest of the field

13%

2,643/20,363

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

18/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$693,364Human Services$317,500Religion$139,825Education$123,939Crime & Legal$17,000Employment$7,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Shady Maple Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · Richard S & Ann B Barshinger Family Fdn · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · North Foundation Inc · Ferree Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation REESE FOUNDATION 47F055017 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MANHEIM TOWNSHIP BIBLE2SCHOOL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852236676 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MANHEIM TOWNSHIP BIBLE2SCHOOL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Reese Foundation 47f055017?

Find your warmest path to Reese Foundation 47f055017 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

REESE FOUNDATION 47F055017

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Reese Foundation 47f055017?

More from the funding graph

REESE FOUNDATION 47F055017

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Reese Foundation 47f055017?

More from the funding graph