· Private foundation
Shady Maple Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k56 grants · $288k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $128k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REVELATIONS OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES | $26,000 |
| CONESTOGA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| WELSH MOUNTAIN HOME | $15,000 |
| CROSSNET MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| SILVER SPRINGS MINISTRIES | $12,000 |
| COBYS FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL OPPURTUNITIES | $10,000 |
| YWAM - ORLANDO | $10,000 |
| LINVILLE HILL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| DAY SEVEN MINISTRIES | $8,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES | $8,000 |
| THE PEACEMAKER CENTER | $7,000 |
| BREATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATI | $5,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS | $5,000 |
| SUNNY CREST HOME INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ROREVELATIONS OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · $198k · revenue +427%
- WMWELSH MOUNTAIN HOME8× · 2017–2024 · $107k · revenue +42%
- CMCROSSNET MINISTRIES7× · 2018–2024 · $95k · revenue +352%
Funded once
- CAChristian Aid Ministriesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +30%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
- SUSIM USA INCORPORATEDone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To teach individuals how to apply the wisdom and depth of the bible's grace-centered message to the problems of daily living; and through various means, work to restore chirst to counseling and christ-centered counseling to the church.
Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…
For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.
Ftlm seeks to equip churches to minister to those who are suffering from addiction and equip christians with the resources needed to facilitate spiritual growth in christlike character and biblical wisdom.
Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.
Biblical counseling
To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…
One another ministries provides member care, counseling, training,and crisis management services to christian organizations and ministries.
Door of hope discipleship ministry is a biblical counseling ministry located in columbus, north carolina, offering discipleship both in group settings at various conferences and teaching ministries and on a personal level through…
To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.
Christlife ministries is a non-denominational program dedicated to the discipleship & restoration of ex-offenders, their families, & the imprisoned. mission begins with turning hearts, minds, and souls of parents to their children and…
The ministry exists to serve offenders in prison and ex-offenders in the community by showing god's love, providing practical assistance, and supporting biblical standards of justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Friendship Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Pathways Hybrid Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REVELATIONS OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds WELSH MOUNTAIN HOME ↗
- Who funds CROSSNET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LINVILLE HILL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ORPHAN RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CAMP ANDREWS ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES ↗
- Who funds UPWARD CALL COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DYNAMIS WORLD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FAITH FRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds WHY NOT YOU MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds HERALDS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTS HOME ↗
- Who funds TENFOLD ↗
- Who funds GREEN MEADOW FARM ↗
- Who funds CAMP HEBRON INC ↗
- Who funds THE FACTORY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FAIRMOUNT HOMES ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Christian Aid Ministries ↗
- Who funds FAITH BUILDERS EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Lancaster County Community Foundation · The Norman & Elizabeth Hahn Family Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Eden Bridge Foundation · Burkholder Family Foundation · Robert C Wenger Charitable Trust · North Foundation Inc · Crels Foundation · Faithful Journey Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shady Maple Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.