· Private foundation
Redirect
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $86k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VOLUNTEER CENTER OF CEDAR VALLEY | $16,000 |
| PERENNIAL | $10,000 |
| MISSOURI GATEWAY GREEN BUILDING COU | $10,000 |
| FOREST RELEAF OF MISSOURI | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| RUSTIC ROOTS SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA | $10,000 |
| URBAN HARVEST STL | $10,000 |
| A PRECIOUS CHILD | $5,000 |
| EASTERN IOWA HEALTH CENTER | $5,000 |
| CASA OF JEFFERSON & GILPIN COUNTIES | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE CENTER | $5,000 |
| DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| PRAIRIE RIDGE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +26%
- APA PRECIOUS CHILD INC2× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%
- ASART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER3× · 2018–2020 · $20k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $17k
- UWUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -89%
- UWUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Louis Earth Day. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY SHARES OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds METROVOLUNTEERS ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF CEDAR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JERSEY CARES INC ↗
- Who funds HANDSON SUBURBAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FOREST RELEAF OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds THE PARK PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI GATEWAY GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PERENNIAL ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds St Louis Earth Day ↗
- Who funds WILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN HARVEST STL ↗
- Who funds YOUTH EMPLOYMENT ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds RUSTIC ROOTS SANCTUARY CO ↗
- Who funds STL YOUTH JOBS ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Carleen and Eugene Grandon Charitable Foundation · The Hall-Perrine Foundation · United Fire Group Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Boettcher Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Redirect funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jersey Cares Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Redirect?
Find your warmest path to Redirect through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.