· Public charity
Redeemer City To City
Redeemer City to City (RCTC) exists to multiply churches and Christian leaders committed to a shared vision for gospel movements in the great cities of the world.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $832k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $792k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Keller Content Development | $650,000 |
| Redeemer East Side | $613,825 |
| City to City Miami | $413,271 |
| Influential Global Ministries | $219,000 |
| Surge Network | $187,531 |
| The Chicago Partnership | $180,000 |
| Crossbridge Church | $94,973 |
| TogetherLA | $60,000 |
| Stratum | $50,000 |
| Liberty Church Washington Heights | $40,000 |
| Acts Church | $40,000 |
| Reunion Church | $40,000 |
| Centro Christiano Familia De Fe Inc | $40,000 |
| Joy Christian Fellowship | $40,000 |
| Park Slope Christian Tabernacle | $35,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Grants abroad, by region: $3.7M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $3.7M to organizations and $49k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Church Planting Development
Stated purpose: Church Planting Development
Stated purpose: Church Planting Development · Church Planting Assistance
Stated purpose: Church Planting Development
Stated purpose: Church Planting Development
Stated purpose: Church Planting Development
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.
100 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $870k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CPCHICAGO PARTNERSHIP FOR CHURCH PLANTING3× · 2022–2024 · $625k · revenue +75% · 71% of their budget
- CTCITY TO CITY SOCAL7× · 2017–2024 · $524k · revenue ×12 · 65% of their budget
- RTREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY5× · 2017–2024 · $417k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- HEHOPE EAST VILLAGE COVENANT CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $60k
- OCONE COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $45k
- NYNew York Dream Center Foursquare Churchone grant, 2020 · $45k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church
To help community build better surrounding for worship
To Train Christian Leaders and Plant Churches in China
Religous Organization
Equip churches and pastors with theological training.
Training pastors in third world countries
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
NY City Serve celebrates and accelerates collaborations that love and serve the city.
Church
How this is measured
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KELLER CONTENT DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO PARTNERSHIP FOR CHURCH PLANTING ↗
- Who funds CITY TO CITY SOCAL ↗
- Who funds REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds STRATUM ↗
- Who funds RED MINISTERIAL DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO CRISTIANO FAMILIA DE FE INC ↗
- Who funds The New York City Leadership Center Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hope for New York · Servant Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Redeemer City To City funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Redeemer City To City. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Redeemer City To City’s filings →