Skip to content

· Private foundation

Red Butterfly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$883k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.4MArts & Culture$1.5MEnvironment$1.3MInternational$771kCivil Rights$695kAnimals$374kHuman Services$361kScience & Tech$188kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $630k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYRIAD USA$150,000
THE 19TH NEWS$125,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ROYAL NATIONAL THEATER$105,000
GLOBAL GREEN GRANTS FUND$75,000
EQUALITY NOW INC$75,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
RAINFOREST TRUST$50,000
SIERRA CLUB$40,000
OCEANWISE VANCOUVER AQUARIUM$35,000
LEWA WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY$25,000
WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS$25,000
ONLY ONE INC SEA LEGACY$20,000
CHICKEN & EGG PICTURES$20,000
AMAZON FRONT LINES$15,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $404k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $65k → 17%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE: $15k → 15%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $35k → 17%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE: $10k → 15%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $35k → 17%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE: $5k → 15%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $35k → 17%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE: $5k → 15%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $35k → 17%FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE: $5k → 15%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $25k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $25k → 17%POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $20k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $19k → 17%POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%CHARITYWATER: $15k → 17%CHARITYWATER: $15k → 17%CHARITYWATER: $10k → 17%CHARITYWATER: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Red Butterfly Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Red Butterfly Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 44 repeat orgs$811k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
23

Total granted

$5.8M
$716k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+11%

Still filing today

61%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T1
    THE 19TH NEWS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $600k · revenue +77%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $510k · revenue +32%
  • WM
    WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $294k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RA
    ROYAL ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $130k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF GRANGE PARK
    one grant, 2018 · $117k
  • EF
    EQUALITY FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
9
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
10
Wild Earth Allies Inc

Our mission is to protect vital areas of our natural world for the benefit of wildlife, habitats, and people by inspiring collaborative action. Our vision is a world where wildlife and people flourish in healthy ecosystems that sustain us…

Environment
11
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
12
Rainforest Action Network

Rainforest Action Network (RAN) works toward a world where the rights and dignity of all communities are respected and where healthy forests, a stable climate and wild biodiversity are protected and celebrated.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is Every Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
27/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EQUALITY FUND CO CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $730,000 · OtherEQUALITY FUND CO CHARITIES AID FOUNDATIONAMERICAN ASSOCIATION ROYAL NATIONAL THEATER: $460,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION ROYAL NATIONAL THEATERIndividual grant recipient: $425,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMATCH INTERNATIONAL: $272,483 · OtherMATCH INTERNATIONALONLY ONE INC: $240,000 · OtherONLY ONE INCOCEANWISE VANCOUVER AQUARIUM: $155,000 · OtherROYAL ACADEMY: $129,600 · OtherIGNITE FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Other+28 more: $1,118,057 · Other+28 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $2,180,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUS…+5 more: $75,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $510,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FO…RAINFOREST TRUST: $271,044 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRU…THOUSAND CURRENTS: $160,000 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRE…MYRIAD USA INC: $150,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCEquality Now Inc: $75,000 · InternationalEquality Now I…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $50,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalTHE 19TH NEWS: $600,000 · Arts & CultureTHE 19TH N…CHICKEN & EGG FILMS INC: $140,500 · Arts & CultureCHICKEN & …ARTOLUTION INC: $41,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $46,595 · Arts & Culture+4 moreGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $435,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GR…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $85,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CON…AMAZON FRONTLINES: $70,000 · EnvironmentAMAZON FR…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CL…AFRICAN HOPE FUND INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentAFRICAN H…International Conservation Fund Corp: $40,000 · Environment+2 more: $30,000 · EnvironmentWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $293,649 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $20,250 · Human ServicesLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $90,500 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $47,545 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals International: $37,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $25,000 · AnimalsSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $25,000 · AnimalsAsia Wild: $11,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,045 · Animals
Other$3,655,140Philanthropy$2,255,000International$1,221,044Arts & Culture$828,095Environment$755,000Human Services$403,899Animals$246,090

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $2,180,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 19TH NEWS: $600,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $510,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $435,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $293,649 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $271,044 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $160,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHICKEN & EGG FILMS INC: $140,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $90,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON FRONTLINES: $70,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $47,545 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN HOPE FUND INC: $45,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetARTOLUTION INC: $41,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetInternational Conservation Fund Corp: $40,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budget350ORG: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $20,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH COALITION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT IN THE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY ORG: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAsia Wild: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S MEDIA FOUNDATION: $10,595 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE 19TH NEWS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICKEN & EGG FILMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON FRONTLINES ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN HOPE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds International Conservation Fund Corp ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Arison Arts Foundation · The Cowles Charitable Trust · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Red Butterfly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Red Butterfly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Red Butterfly Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Red Butterfly Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Red Butterfly’s filings →

More from the funding graph