Skip to content
Reardon - Mohr Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Reardon - Mohr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$120kRecreation & Sports$51kYouth Development$36kEducation$26kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$7kPhilanthropy$6kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA$3,100
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NORTHFIELD HAVEN$500
TEAMMATES OF LINCOLN$100
Individual grant recipient$61
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE TERRY AND HAZELDEANE CARPENTER INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER: $5k → 15%CARPENTER CENTER: $3k → 15%THE TERRY AND HAZELDEANE CARPENTER INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER: $3k → 15%BUCKBOARD THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $500 → 15%THE TERRY AND HAZELDEANE CARPENTER INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 12 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$223k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+11%

Still filing today

42%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue -49%
  • SB
    SCOTTSBLUFF BOOSTER CLUB
    3× · 2018–2022 · $38k · revenue -58%
  • Y
    YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SCOTTSBLUFF PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +390%
  • WN
    WESTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +42%
  • 2C
    23 CLUB INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska High School Sports Hall of Fame Foundation

High school sports hall of fame foundation

—
2
Nebraska Game and Parks Foundation

The organization is focused on the future of parks, wildlife management and conservation of nebraska.

Environment
3
Chadron State Foundation

The chadron state foundation is dedicated to enhancing chadron state college's ability to meet its primary educational mission in western nebraska. the foundation supports scholarship programs for the college and undertakes fundraising…

—
4
Scott Community College Foundation

Organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes. solicits funds and other gifts.

—
5
The Nebraska Cooperative Council Education Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to encourage high school graduates to pursue higher education in the agricultural and agribusiness fields through scholarships and the implementation of school-to-work programs with participating nebraska…

Education
6
Western Wyoming College Foundation

Support of western wyoming community college programs and scholarships

Education
7
Kansas Golf Foundation

The foundation promotes the future, and preserves the history, of golf in kansas.

—
8
South Dakota Golf Association Junior Golf Foundation

Carry out charitable & educational purposes of sdga

Youth Development
9
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
10
Scotts Bluff County Agricultural Society

Operation and maintenance of the scotts bluff county fairgrounds and annual county fair

Food & Nutrition
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
North Central State College Foundation

The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Regional West Foundation; the most unlike its peers is 11 13 Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION: $118,148 · HealthREGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION+2 more: $700 · HealthYMCA: $31,870 · OtherYMCATHE SCOTTSBLUFF PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · OtherTHE SCOTTSBLUFF PUBLIC SCHOO…FRIENDS OF THE MIDWEST THEATRE: $7,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MIDWEST THEAT…THE TERRY AND HAZELDEANE CARPENTER: $3,285 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · Other+14 more: $5,508 · Other+14 moreSCOTTSBLUFF BOOSTER CLUB: $37,500 · EducationSCOTTSBLUFF BOOSTER C…WESTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,500 · EducationWESTERN NEBRASKA COMM…+3 more: $1,350 · EducationTERRY & HAZELDEAN CARPENTER INTL CENTER: $11,285 · Human ServicesBUCKBOARD THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $500 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $6,350 · Youth Development23 CLUB INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentOREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,560 · PhilanthropyNORTHFIELD HAVEN INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Health$118,848Other$66,763Education$50,350Human Services$11,785Youth Development$11,350Philanthropy$5,560Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION: $118,148 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetSCOTTSBLUFF BOOSTER CLUB: $37,500 over 3y, 23% of budgetWESTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTERRY & HAZELDEAN CARPENTER INTL CENTER: $11,285 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $6,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,560 over 5y, 0.4% of budget23 CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEBRASKA GOLF FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKIMBALL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetADVENTURE WEST COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHFIELD HAVEN INC: $500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBUCKBOARD THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFESTIVAL OF HOPE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY OF THE PLAINS MUSEUM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget11 13 MINISTRIES: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTSBLUFF BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE SCOTTSBLUFF PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TERRY & HAZELDEAN CARPENTER INTL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds OREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 23 CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIMBALL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURE WEST COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKBOARD THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WESTERN NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FESTIVAL OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY OF THE PLAINS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds 11 13 MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cw Yount Foundation I…Oregon Trail Communit…Quivey-Bay State Foun…Lockwood FoundationThe Fliesbach Family …United Way of Western…Bnsf Railway Foundati…First Interstate Banc…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Cw Yount Foundation IncNE26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cw Yount Foundation Inc · Oregon Trail Community Foundation · Quivey-Bay State Foundation · Lockwood Foundation · The Fliesbach Family Foundation · United Way of Western Nebraska · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reardon - Mohr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reardon - Mohr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reardon - Mohr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home