· Community foundation
Oregon Trail Community Foundation
Community betterment
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $716,051 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,419,629 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $703,578 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $300k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $395k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIVERSIDE DISCOVERY CENTER | $96,500 |
| NORTHFIELD HAVEN | $75,000 |
| CIRRUS HOUSE | $59,100 |
| COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES | $58,000 |
| CAPWN | $54,900 |
| SCOTTSBLUFF SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $51,000 |
| SCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY VOLUNTEER CENTER | $47,919 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION | $33,000 |
| HEMINGFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $23,580 |
| CASA OF SCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY | $20,200 |
| BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| 11 13 MINISTRIES | $19,200 |
| HORIZON MUSIC FESTIVAL | $16,500 |
| THE DOVES PROGRAM | $15,190 |
| POTTER'S WHEEL MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $303k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $303k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WNWEST NEBRASKA ARTS CENTER2× · 2017–2020 · $824k · revenue +27%
- RZRIVERSIDE ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $332k · revenue +29%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $286k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- RWREGIONAL WEST HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2018 · $148k · revenue -33%
- BPBAYARD PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2018 · $50k
- CSCREATIVE SITES LLCone grant, 2018 · $46k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Creating and improving housing to open doors for economic opportunities.
Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.
The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.
To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.
To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…
To provide lodging to families of hospitalized children at an affordable cost, or no cost, based on need through operation of the ronald mcdonald house.
To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.
The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…
Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.
Coordinate and participate in fostering, promoting, encouraging, developing, and assisting with affordable housing and economic development in scotts bluff county nebraska and surrounding areas.
The organization is focused on the future of parks, wildlife management and conservation of nebraska.
Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Western Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is 11 13 Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 32. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST NEBRASKA ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds OREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MIDWEST THEATER ↗
- Who funds PLATTE RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTS IN ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL WEST HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds CIRRUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCOTTSBLUFF PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 11 13 MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds LEGACY OF THE PLAINS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds 23 CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SCOTTSBLUFF ↗
- Who funds BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TERRY & HAZELDEAN CARPENTER INTL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WESTERN NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds CHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FESTIVAL OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURE WEST COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Horizon To Horizon ↗
- Who funds THE DOVES PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM OF SCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Potters Wheel Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Fliesbach Family Foundation · United Way of Western Nebraska · Reardon - Mohr Foundation · Quivey-Bay State Foundation · Cw Yount Foundation Inc · Lockwood Foundation · G a Fliesbach Foundation · Nebraska Children & Families Foundation · Snow Redfern Memorial Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oregon Trail Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.