· Private foundation
Quivey-Bay State Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $228k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION | $28,167 |
| WESTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $20,500 |
| SCOTTSBLUFF COUNTY AG SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| YMCA | $18,000 |
| SCOTTSBLUFF PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $17,500 |
| FEDERATED CHURCH | $16,500 |
| NEBRASKA INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FOUND | $15,000 |
| TWIN CITY LEGION BOOSTER CLUB | $15,000 |
| MITCHELL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $15,000 |
| CARPENTER CENTER | $12,000 |
| CIRRUS HOUSE | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE MITCHELL LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| ESU 13 | $10,000 |
| CHADRON STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PANHANDLE HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RWREGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $128k · revenue +5%
- CHCIRRUS HOUSE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +14%
- PHPANHANDLE HUMANE SOCIETY5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- NSNEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2021 · $15k
- 2C23 CLUB BASEBALLone grant, 2021 · $15k
- GSGERING SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve healthcare by collecting, analyzing, and sharing information about patient safety; and to ensure compliance with the patient safety improvement act.
To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.
We are in the process of opening a Childrens Museum where the youth of our community can learn through educational exhibits.
The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…
The nebraska cancer specialists (ncs) hope foundation is a nonprofit organization that seeks to improve the lives of individuals and families in the community and the surrounding areas who are impacted by cancer treatment.
The nebraska state historical society foundation's mission is to support the preservation, interpretation and appreciation of nebraska history.
The organization is focused on the future of parks, wildlife management and conservation of nebraska.
Encourage students to learn and apply god's truth while promoting academic excellence in a christian environment.
Provision of christ centered education with scholastic excellence.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
The sioux falls state theatre company is a 501(c)(3) organization with a mission to preserve a historic landmark and provide community access to a unique state-of-the-art entertainment and education venue. the renovated state theatre will…
A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Saving Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Capstone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REGIONAL WEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CIRRUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PANHANDLE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TERRY & HAZELDEAN CARPENTER INTL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MIDWEST THEATER ↗
- Who funds OREGON TRAIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FESTIVAL OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds LEGACY OF THE PLAINS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds Sioux County Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES LEGION BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CAPSTONE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cw Yount Foundation Inc · The Fliesbach Family Foundation · G a Fliesbach Foundation · Reardon - Mohr Foundation · Lockwood Foundation · Oregon Trail Community Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Snow Redfern Memorial Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Quivey-Bay State Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Quivey-Bay State Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Quivey-Bay State Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.