· Private foundation
Realex Charitable Fund Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMREI YOSHAR HIGH INSTITUTE OF TORA STUDIES | $148,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 19% of grant dollars ($290k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 81% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 81% of all-years giving ($1.2M)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC3× · 2017–2020 · $41k · revenue +383%
- MUMIKVAH USA INC2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +61%
- OAOHEL AVRAHAM2× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVAone grant, 2019 · $20k
- CMCONGREGATION MINCHAS YEHUDAone grant, 2019 · $15k
- YOYESHIVA OHR TORAHone grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To further jewish education in israel
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
Support of ha'am ha'yehudi b'tel aviv
Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.
Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide
To provide grants to jewish religious organization in need.
Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.
Furtherance of jewish education
To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel
To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds MIKVAH USA INC ↗
- Who funds SOLOMON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds OHEL AVRAHAM ↗
- Who funds OUR PLACE IN NY INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS CHARITY FUND FOR ISRAEL ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Fjc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Realex Charitable Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Realex Charitable Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Realex Charitable Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Realex Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Realex’s filings →