Skip to content

· Public charity

Ready Set Grow Inc

Ready, set, grow inc.

$214k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$504kEducation$18kInternational$8k
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $100,430, the rows itemized in this filing. The $214,128 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $113,698 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KUPAS HACHESED FOUNDATION INC$21,000
YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH$17,540
YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM TORAS EMES$15,181
MESIVTHA TIFERETH JERUSALEM$11,009
YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC$10,000
NETZACH FOUNDATION INC$8,000
BNOS BASYA INC$6,330
CONGREGATION SIYATA DISHMAYA$5,870
CONGREGATION BAIS AVROHOM INC$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 12 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$316k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+25%

Still filing today

17%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $57k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $46k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $29k

Funded once

  • CP
    CONGREGATION PRI AHARON
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
  • CL
    CHEVRAH LOMDEI TORAH
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • AC
    AHAVAS CHESED
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
5
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
6
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
8
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
9
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Cheder Toras Zev

Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
11
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
12
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tzedakah Vchesed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC: $57,480 · OtherYESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INCIndividual grant recipient: $28,805 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA STOLIN KARLIN: $25,410 · OtherYESHIVA STOLIN KARLINIndividual grant recipient: $24,505 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION PRI AHARON: $24,000 · OtherCONGREGATION PRI AHARONCONGREGATION OHR CHAIM: $23,330 · OtherCONGREGATION OHR CHAIMCONGREGATION SIYATA DISHMAYA: $22,415 · OtherCONGREGATION SIYATA DISHMAYAMESIVTHA TIFERETH JERUSALEM: $18,599 · OtherMESIVTHA TIFERETH JERUSALEMGENERATION: $14,520 · OtherCHEVRAH LOMDEI TORAH: $13,500 · OtherAHAVAS CHESED: $12,950 · Other+10 more: $68,244 · Other+10 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA: $45,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF …TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC: $24,888 · ReligionTORAS EMES ACADEMY O…YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $10,000 · ReligionYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV I…YESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA: $7,650 · ReligionYESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEH…YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC: $7,205 · ReligionYESHIVA EITZ CHAIM O…YESHIVAS OHR YISSOCHOR ACADEMY INC: $16,640 · EducationYESHIVAS OH…BNOS BASYA INC % MOSHE N BENDER: $13,830 · EducationBNOS BASYA …BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $8,550 · EducationBNOS MELECH…MESIVTA MEROMEI TZVI INC: $6,995 · EducationMESIVTA MER…LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $6,125 · EducationLAKEWOOD CH…KUPAS HACHESED FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · InternationalBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $7,960 · InternationalTZEDAKAH VCHESED INC: $5,600 · InternationalTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $6,525 · Food & Nutrition
Other$333,758Religion$95,543Education$52,140International$34,560Human Services$8,000Food & Nutrition$6,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA: $45,800 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetKUPAS HACHESED FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR YISSOCHOR ACADEMY INC: $16,640 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBNOS BASYA INC % MOSHE N BENDER: $13,830 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $8,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $7,960 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA: $7,650 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC: $7,205 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMESIVTA MEROMEI TZVI INC: $6,995 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $6,525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $6,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZEDAKAH VCHESED INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA ↗
  • Who funds TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds KUPAS HACHESED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR YISSOCHOR ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BASYA INC % MOSHE N BENDER ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA MEROMEI TZVI INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TZEDAKAH VCHESED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY38.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Mns Foundation · Dirshu International Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ready Set Grow Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ready Set Grow Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ready Set Grow Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ready Set Grow Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ready Set Grow’s filings →

More from the funding graph