How much did Dirshu International Inc grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of Dirshu International Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

congregation

2023

camp

2024

keren

2025

yakovezraskerenyosefcampbaiscongregation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k36 grants · $89k
$10k–50k4 grants · $81k
$250k+1 grant · $442k

$1,200

Median grant

States reached

$14k

Total assets

Largest grants

Chaburah Study Group$442,395
Bais Leah$27,205
Yeshivas Stolin Karlin$25,000
Yeshiva Ohr Moshe$18,600
Yeshiva Keren Orah$10,000
Talmud Torah Bais Avrohom$9,500
Bais Rochel$9,000
The NY Seminary$7,000
Keren Yakov$7,000
Meoros Bais Yaakov$6,500
Other American Grants$6,350
Congregation Ginzei Yosef$6,100
Ezras Yisrael$5,250
Mesivta Shevet Halevi$4,800
Congregation Pre Ahron$4,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.8M · 35 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.8M

$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%

+31%

Still filing today

29%

17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LC
Lakewood Cheder School
7× · 2018–2024 · $68k · revenue +54%
BT
Bais Tova
6× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +53%
YO
Yeshiva Orchos Chaim
5× · 2020–2024 · $38k · revenue +65%

Funded once

CS
Congregation Shaarei Tefilah
one grant, 2019 · $25k
MP
Machon Pri Eitz Chaim Incgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +86%
BH
Bnos Hadassah
one grant, 2021 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education

Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified

Cheder Toras Zev

Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education

Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education

Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education

Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc

Masores bnos yisroel is a religious elementary school providing quality education for the children of lakewood nj.

Education

Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education

Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education

Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To conduct a school for religious jewish education

Education

Bais Yaakov Girls High School of

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education

Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs

Educational-operation of private girls' high school

—

Yeshiva Derech Hatorah

To create a learning environment with jewish tradition and values that strives to help every student attain their highest educational goal.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc and the most unlike its peers is Misaskim Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

1,878/19,842

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

13/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,692,547Education$211,240Religion$19,050Human Services$15,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY27.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Mns Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Dirshu International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Machon Pri Eitz Chaim Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +86% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 472590038 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Machon Pri Eitz Chaim Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dirshu International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dirshu International Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Dirshu International Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dirshu International Inc?

More from the funding graph

Dirshu International Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dirshu International Inc?

More from the funding graph