· Public charity
Ready Set Grow Inc
Ready, set, grow inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $100,430 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $214,128 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $113,698 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KUPAS HACHESED FOUNDATION INC | $21,000 |
| YESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH | $17,540 |
| YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM TORAS EMES | $15,181 |
| MESIVTHA TIFERETH JERUSALEM | $11,009 |
| YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC | $10,000 |
| NETZACH FOUNDATION INC | $8,000 |
| BNOS BASYA INC | $6,330 |
| CONGREGATION SIYATA DISHMAYA | $5,870 |
| CONGREGATION BAIS AVROHOM INC | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YCYESHIVA CHEMDAS HATORAH INC4× · 2020–2023 · $57k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA2× · 2021–2022 · $46k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2020–2021 · $29k
Funded once
- CPCONGREGATION PRI AHARONone grant, 2021 · $24k
- CLCHEVRAH LOMDEI TORAHone grant, 2021 · $14k
- ACAHAVAS CHESEDone grant, 2020 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.
Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.
To provide religious Jewish education.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tzedakah Vchesed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA ↗
- Who funds TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds KUPAS HACHESED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS OHR YISSOCHOR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds BNOS BASYA INC % MOSHE N BENDER ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC ↗
- Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds THE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC ↗
- Who funds MESIVTA MEROMEI TZVI INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
- Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TZEDAKAH VCHESED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Mns Foundation · Dirshu International Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ready Set Grow Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc — 21% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ready Set Grow Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ready Set Grow Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.