· Private foundation
Rd & Joan Dale Hubbard Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $123k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $280k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NM ATHLETICS LOBO CLU | $100,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NM ATHLETICS LOBO CLU | $50,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| RUIDOSO DOWNS RACETRACK CHAPEL | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC | $29,500 |
| NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY OF LAS | $26,250 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SPENCER THEATER | $25,000 |
| COLLEGE OF THE DESERT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SPENCER THEATER | $25,000 |
| GUTHRIE OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATI | $20,000 |
| MCCALLUM THEATRE | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
85 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $479k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THThe Hubbard Family Foundation Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $13M · revenue +24%
- EMEisenhower Medical Center4× · 2019–2022 · $2.5M · revenue +70%
- SHSCRIPPS HEALTH2× · 2019–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +46%
Funded once
- LDLIVING DESERT THEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +100%
- KDKENTUCKY DERBY MUSEUM CORPORATIONone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +24%
- CSCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINOone grant, 2022 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Albuquerque academy is a non-denominational, coeducational, independent day school.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
The colorado mountain college foundation builds sustainable community support for the needs and strategic priorities of colorado mountain college and its students.
Roseman university of health sciences advances the health and wellness of the communities we serve by educating current and future generations of health professionals, conducting research and providing patient care. we actively pursue…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Shaped by christian principles, mcmurry university challenges students to examine our complex world from multiple perspectives in preparation for lives of leadership, service and professional success.
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…
The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Autry Museum of the American West and the most unlike its peers is The Annexstad Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Hubbard Family Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY DERBY MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC ↗
- Who funds SUNPORCH OF SMITH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SPENCER THEATER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SKI APACHE ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds HOPE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAVES & LINCOLN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds HELP END ABUSE FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rolla R Hinkle III Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Hubbard Family Foundation · Jewell Miears Fielder Foundation · The Andersen Family Foundation Inc · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rd & Joan Dale Hubbard Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rd & Joan Dale Hubbard Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rd & Joan Dale Hubbard Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.