Skip to content
Raynier Institute & Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Raynier Institute & Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$12MHealth$5.5MEducation$4.6MHousing & Shelter$4.0MHuman Services$3.0MPhilanthropy$1.8MEnvironment$1.5MReligion$1.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $395k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHFFFT COMPANY INC$280,000
SAINT CHARLES BORROMEO SEMINARY$250,000
GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL$250,000
FOUNDING FORWARD$250,000
ELUNA$200,000
FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC$200,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$200,000
PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION$200,000
KIRKLAND PERFORMANCE CENTER$150,000
SIFF$150,000
THIRD STONE$150,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERISTY OF PENNSYLVANIA$150,000
BELLEVUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$150,000
GEORGETOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$150,000
THE RHAPSODY PROJECT$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NYC MESH: $5k → 17%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $15k → 7%LIFETIME ADVOCACY PLUS: $5k → 9%NYC MESH: $5k → 17%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $15k → 7%LIFETIME ADVOCACY PLUS: $5k → 9%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $15k → 7%LIFETIME ADVOCACY PLUS: $5k → 9%LIFETIME ADVOCACY PLUS: $5k → 9%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $10k → 7%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $10k → 7%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $10k → 7%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $8k → 7%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $8k → 7%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $8k → 7%TELLURIDE SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $8k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $575k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $300k → 22%TODAY IS A GOOD DAY: $10k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $50k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $50k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $250k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $250k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $250k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $200k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $184k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $67k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $10k → 22%MILLIONAIR CLUB INC: $150k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $100k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $50k → 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB INC: $10k → 9%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $175k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $150k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $125k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $65k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%UNEXPECTED PRODUCTIONS INC: $150k → 9%LAKE CITY PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS: $100k → 9%LAKE CITY PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 9%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $150k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $150k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $150k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Raynier Institute & Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Raynier Institute & Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 130 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

130 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 85 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

130
142

Total granted

$27M
$7.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    6× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +67%
  • ML
    Main Line Hospitals Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.5M · revenue +49%
  • FT
    FACE TO FACE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • RH
    RICHARD HUGO HOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $657k · revenue -20%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue +13%
  • TA
    TILTH ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $300k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle JazzED

Through Jazz education that liberates and inspires, Seattle JazzED increase access in the music room, celebrates student expression, and builds lasting connection rooted in community.

Arts & Culture
2
Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc

The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.

Arts & Culture
3
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
4
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
5
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
6
Ten Thousand Things Theater

Ten Thousand Things awakens the creative spirit of audiences and artists by bringing essential and exceptional theater to people from all backgrounds and life experiences.

Arts & Culture
7
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
8
Pacific Resident Theatre Ensemble

Pacific resident theatre ensemble provides the los angeles area with a resident theater company dedicated to providing programing of the highest quality, presented in a environmental and participative style, in order to entertain, inform…

—
9
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
10
Bandit Theater

A Seattle-based improv theater with the mission to foster creativity, build community, and inspire personal growth through the art of comedy.

Arts & Culture
11
Seattle Opera

To thrill, inspire and educate through the shared experience of opera. seattle opera is vital to the dynamic cultural and civic life of our region and to the evolution of opera across the world.

Arts & Culture
12
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tacoma Arts Live; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

257 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 257 of the 309 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
80
Early backer (in before they grew)
250/257
Grantees still filing
172/257
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIA: $1,000,000 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIAEarshot Jazz Society of Seattle: $940,000 · Arts & CultureEarshot Jazz Society of Sea…RICHARD HUGO HOUSE: $657,000 · Arts & CultureRICHARD HUGO HOUSETHE PHFFFT COMPANY INC: $445,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ NIGHT SCHOOL: $435,000 · Arts & CultureEXPERIENCE LEARNING COMMUNITY: $400,000 · Arts & CultureWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $340,000 · Arts & CultureSouth Hudson Music Project: $320,000 · Arts & CultureKareem World Orchestra: $305,000 · Arts & Culture+39 more: $4,297,000 · Arts & Culture+39 morePROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION: $1,130,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATIONLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA: $750,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF …SAINT CHARLES BORROMEO SEMINARY: $500,000 · OtherANCILLAE-ASSUMPTA ACADEMY: $435,000 · OtherFOUNDING FORWARD (FORMERLY THE UNION LEAGUE LEGACY FOUNDATION): $525,000 · OtherUNITED STATES SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOC INC: $415,000 · OtherWILD FISH CONSERVANCY: $350,000 · Other+77 more: $6,093,500 · Other+77 morePROJECT HOME: $2,475,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEFACE TO FACE INC: $1,210,000 · Human ServicesFACE TO FACE INCEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania: $600,000 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Communi…YOUTHCARE: $325,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE+12 more: $1,300,000 · Human Services+12 moreMain Line Hospitals Inc: $1,500,000 · HealthMain Line Hos…ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · HealthABINGTON HEAL…LIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 · HealthLIVENGRIN FOU…COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $350,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOL…SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $315,000 · HealthSEA MAR COMMU…LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $250,000 · HealthLIVING BEYOND…ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Health+12 more: $482,500 · Health+12 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,005,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF T…BYERSCHOOL FOUNDATION: $850,000 · EducationBYERSCHOOL FO…DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $510,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVER…INDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS: $410,000 · EducationINDEPENDENCE …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $255,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…RUSSELL BYERS CHARTER SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationRUSSELL BYERS…FOUNDATION FOR READING AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $200,000 · EducationSPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY: $165,000 · EducationThird Stone: $150,000 · EducationWESTERN NEON SCHOOL OF ART: $150,000 · Education+8 more: $459,500 · Education+8 morePCC FARMLAND TRUST: $600,000 · EnvironmentHISTORIC SEATTLE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $550,000 · EnvironmentTILTH ALLIANCE: $300,000 · EnvironmentTHE FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC: $265,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE SEATTLE: $200,000 · EnvironmentPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND: $200,000 · EnvironmentPUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE: $100,000 · Environment+2 more: $70,000 · EnvironmentPHILADELPHIA YOUTH SPORTS COLLABORATIVE: $260,000 · PhilanthropyFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 5 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CRANALEITH SPIRITUAL CENTER: $135,000 · PhilanthropyJESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST: $100,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $38,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$9,139,000Other$10,198,500Human Services$5,910,000Health$4,547,500Education$4,404,500Environment$2,285,000Philanthropy$808,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT HOME: $2,475,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetMain Line Hospitals Inc: $1,500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFACE TO FACE INC: $1,210,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetPROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION: $1,130,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,005,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIA: $1,000,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetEarshot Jazz Society of Seattle: $940,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetBYERSCHOOL FOUNDATION: $850,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA: $750,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetPCC FARMLAND TRUST: $600,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania: $600,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetHISTORIC SEATTLE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetFOUNDING FORWARD (FORMERLY THE UNION LEAGUE LEGACY FOUNDATION): $525,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $510,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PHFFFT COMPANY INC: $445,000 over 3y, 72% of budgetJAZZ NIGHT SCHOOL: $435,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetUNITED STATES SQUASH RACQUETS ASSOC INC: $415,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetINDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS: $410,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEXPERIENCE LEARNING COMMUNITY: $400,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWILD FISH CONSERVANCY: $350,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $350,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $340,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $325,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSouth Hudson Music Project: $320,000 over 6y, 62% of budgetSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $315,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKareem World Orchestra: $305,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER: $300,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC: $265,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH SPORTS COLLABORATIVE: $260,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $255,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $250,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetRUSSELL BYERS CHARTER SCHOOL: $250,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSEATTLE JAZZ FELLOWSHIP: $250,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $250,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $250,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 5 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 80% of budgetTRICOUNTY COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $225,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetStrawberry Theatre Workshop: $215,000 over 4y, 52% of budgetPHOTO CENTER NW: $205,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCLASSICAL 981: $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR READING AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $200,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSUSTAINABLE SEATTLE: $200,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND: $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetJack Straw Foundation: $175,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $175,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ArtsfundThe Norcliffe Foundat…Seattle FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Lucky Seven FoundationConnelly FoundationWyman Youth TrustThe Cedarcrest Charit…The Philadelphia Foun…Moccasin Lake Foundat…Fales Foundation TrustUnited Way of King Co…
ArtsfundWA91.8× affinity64 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Artsfund · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Philadelphia Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Fales Foundation Trust · United Way of King County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raynier Institute & Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raynier Institute & Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest: 38% of income from government
  • HomeWorks Trenton: 6% of income from government
  • The Wetlands Institute: 2% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Raynier Institute & Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Raynier Institute & Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 309 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Raynier Institute &’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home