Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Raymond J and Kathryn D Harbert Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$790kFood & Nutrition$275kReligion$75kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$125,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOODBANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$125,000
THE HOPE INSTITUTE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%COLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
2
Community Kitchens of Birmingham

Assistance to homeless and needy persons.

Food & Nutrition
3
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
4
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
5
Birmingham Promise Inc

Birmingham Promise supports and prepares every Birmingham City School student in achieving economic security, mobility, and prosperity by providing connections to high-quality work experiences and last-dollar tuition scholarships

Education
6
Covenant Academy of Mobile

Operation of a public charter school in Mobile Alabama.

Human Services
7
Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

8
University Charter School

Operation of a public charter school in Livingston, AL.

Education
9
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

10
The Alabama Center for Law and Civic Education

The mission of ACLCE is to prepare youth to become active, engaged, and informed participants in a democratic society.

11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Birmingham Inc

Match adult volunteers with at-risk children. To promote a friendship which will build confidence and self-esteem in order to promote improved decision-making and reduce problems into adulthood.

12
Birmingham Bar Association

The mission of the birmingham bar association is to uphold the strength and integrity of the legal profession, promote justice, foster civility, and support our members through professional development, education, and community engagement.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birmingham Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Hope Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UAB — $600,000 · OtherUABJONES VALLEY TEACHING FARM — $150,000 · OtherJONES VALLEY TEACHING FARMST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $75,000 · OtherST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH+2 more — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $125,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY F…The Hope Institute — $75,000 · Human ServicesThe Hope I…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM — $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOME…COLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BIRMINGHAM — $10,000 · Human ServicesCOLLAT JEW…BIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationBIRMINGHAM…THE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationPRESCHOOL PARTNERS — $5,000 · Education
Other$835,000Food & Nutrition$125,000Human Services$115,000Education$110,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetThe Hope Institute — $75,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BIRMINGHAM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPRESCHOOL PARTNERS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Protective Life FoundationAL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Junior League of Birmingham Inc · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Raymond J and Kathryn D Harbert Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Raymond J and Kathryn D Harbert Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Raymond J and Kathryn D Harbert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph